Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23683120›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Family meetings for older adults in intermediate care settings: the impact of patient cognitive impairment and other characteristics on shared decision making.

Catherine M Milte, Julie Ratcliffe, Owen Davies, Craig Whitehead, Stacey Masters, Maria Crotty

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Assuring patient participation and care continuity in intermediate care: Getting the most out of family meetings using the four habits model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Shared Decision Making of Older Adults in Healthcare.Working with older people (Brighton, England) · 2019
    Article
  10. No question too small: development of a question prompt list for parents of critically ill infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine M MilteDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Julie RatcliffeClinical Effectiveness Cluster, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Owen DaviesDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Craig WhiteheadDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Stacey MastersDiscipline of General Practice, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Maria CrottyDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinicians, older adults and caregivers frequently meet to make decisions around treatment and lifestyle during an acute hospital admission. Patient age, psychological status and health locus of control (HLC) influence patient preference for consultation involvement and information but overall, a shared-decision-making (SDM) approach is favoured. However, it is not known whether these characteristics and the presence of cognitive impairment influence SDM competency during family meetings.

objectiveTo describe meetings between older adults, caregivers and geriatricians in intermediate care and explore patient and meeting characteristics associated with a SDM communication style.

methodsFifty-nine family meetings involving geriatricians, patients in an intermediate care setting following an acute hospital admission and their caregivers were rated using the OPTION system for measuring clinician SDM behaviour. The geriatric depression scale and multidimensional HLC scale were completed by patients. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE) assessed patient's level of cognitive impairment.

resultsMeetings lasted 38 min (SD 13) and scored 41 (SD 17) of 100 on the OPTION scale. Nine (SD 2.2) topics were discussed during each meeting, and most were initiated by the geriatrician. Meeting length was an important determinant of OPTION score, with higher SDM competency displayed in longer meetings. Patient characteristics, including MMSE, HLC and depression did not explain SDM competency.

conclusionWhilst SDM can be achieved during consultations frail older patients and their caregivers, an increased consultation time is a consequence of this approach.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFamilyIntermediate Care FacilitiesPatient ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCognition DisordersFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatricsHumansInternal-External ControlMaledecision makingfrail elderlyhealth services for agedphysician-patient relations

Identifiers

PMID23683120
PMCPMC5060899
OpenAlexW2054324610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.