Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23681608›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2013

Moving from basic toward systems pharmacodynamic models.

William J Jusko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Towards a comprehensive assessment of QSP models: what would it take?Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William J JuskoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA. wjjusko@buffalo.edu

Funding

Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and PharmacodynamicsR37GM024211 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 2005 to 2014
$6.4M
CORTICOSTEROID PHARMACOKINETICS/DYNAMICSR01GM024211 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 1985 to 2018
$4.7M
MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN PHARMACODYNAMICSR01GM057980 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J., KRZYZANSKI, WOJCIECH · 1998 to 2013
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 24211NIGMS NIH HHS GM 57980NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM024211NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057980NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM024211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building upon many classical foundations of pharmacology, a diverse array of mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models have emerged based on mechanisms of drug action and primary rate-limiting or turnover processes in physiology. An array of basic models can be extended to handle various complexities including tolerance and can readily be employed as building blocks in assembling enhanced PK/PD or small systems models. Our corticosteroid models demonstrate these concepts as well as elements of horizontal and vertical integration of molecular to whole-body processes. The potential advantages and challenges in moving PK/PD toward systems models are described.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPharmacokineticsPharmacological PhenomenaAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansSystems Biologydose responseindirect response modelsmathematical modelpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticspharmacometricspreclinical pharmacokineticssystems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID23681608
PMCPMC3743951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.