Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23681545›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2013

Neuromonitoring in thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis of effectiveness from randomized controlled trials.

Alvaro Sanabria, Adonis Ramirez, Luiz P Kowalski, Carl E Silver, Ashok R Shaha, Randall P Owen, Carlos Suárez, Avi Khafif, Alessandra Rinaldo, Alfio Ferlito

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Intra Operative Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitering During Thyroid Surgery - Is It Worth?Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Alvaro SanabriaDepartment of Surgery, Universidad de Antioquia, Universidad de La Sabana-Oncology Unit, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia.
Adonis Ramirez
Luiz P Kowalski
Carl E Silver
Ashok R Shaha
Randall P Owen
Carlos Suárez
Avi Khafif
Alessandra Rinaldo
Alfio Ferlito
University of Udine · ITAC Camargo Hospital · BRAssuta Medical Center · ILHospital Pablo Tobon Uribe · COIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias · ESMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMontefiore Medical Center · USUniversidad Surcolombiana · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromonitoring in thyroid surgery has been employed to make nerve identification easier and decrease the rates of laryngeal nerve injuries. Several individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published, which did not identify statistical differences in the rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) or external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) injuries. The objective of this report is to perform meta-analysis of the combined results of individual studies to measure the frequency of RLN and EBSLN injuries in patients who underwent thyroidectomy with routine neuromonitoring in comparison with common practice of search and identification. RCTs comparing routine neuromonitoring versus no use in patients who underwent elective partial or total thyroidectomy were evaluated. Outcomes measured were temporary and definitive palsy of the RLN and EBSLN. A systematic review and meta-analysis was done using random effects model. GRADE was used to classify quality of evidence. Six studies with 1,602 patients and 3,064 nerves at risk were identified. Methodological quality assessment showed high risk of bias in most items. Funnel plot did not reveal publication bias. The risk difference for temporary RLN palsy, definitive RLN palsy, temporary EBSLN palsy, and definitive EBSLN palsy were -2% (95% confidence interval -5.1 to 1); 0% (-1 to 1); -9% (-15 to -2) and -1% (-4 to 2), respectively. Quality was rated low or very low in most outcomes due to methodological flaws. Meta-analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the risk of temporary or definitive RLN injury and definitive EBSLN injury with the use of neuromonitoring. The neuromonitoring group had a statistically significant decrease in the risk of temporary EBSLN injury.

Indexed as

ThyroidectomyHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringLaryngeal Nerve InjuriesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskThyroid DiseasesVocal Cord Paralysis

Identifiers

PMID23681545
OpenAlexW2055258183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.