Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23681256›Full record

SynthesisComputers, informatics, nursing : CIN2013

Managing complex research datasets using electronic tools: a meta-analysis exemplar.

Sharon A Brown, Ellen E Martin, Theresa J Garcia, Mary A Winter, Alexandra A García, Adama Brown, Heather E Cuevas, Lisa L Sumlin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sharon A BrownSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA. sabrown@mail.utexas.edu
Ellen E Martin
Theresa J Garcia
Mary A Winter
Alexandra A García
Adama Brown
Heather E Cuevas
Lisa L Sumlin

Funding

Meta-Analysis of Biobehavioral Determinants of Health Outcomes in Type 2 DiabetesR01NR011450 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BROWN, SHARON A · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-analyses of broad scope and complexity require investigators to organize many study documents and manage communication among several research staff. Commercially available electronic tools, for example, EndNote, Adobe Acrobat Pro, Blackboard, Excel, and IBM SPSS Statistics (SPSS), are useful for organizing and tracking the meta-analytic process as well as enhancing communication among research team members. The purpose of this article is to describe the electronic processes designed, using commercially available software, for an extensive, quantitative model-testing meta-analysis. Specific electronic tools improved the efficiency of (a) locating and screening studies, (b) screening and organizing studies and other project documents, (c) extracting data from primary studies, (d) checking data accuracy and analyses, and (e) communication among team members. The major limitation in designing and implementing a fully electronic system for meta-analysis was the requisite upfront time to decide on which electronic tools to use, determine how these tools would be used, develop clear guidelines for their use, and train members of the research team. The electronic process described here has been useful in streamlining the process of conducting this complex meta-analysis and enhancing communication and sharing documents among research team members.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsClinical Coding

Identifiers

PMID23681256
PMCPMC3703244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.