Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23680181›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Challenges for consent and community engagement in the conduct of cluster randomized trial among school children in low income settings: experiences from Kenya.

George Okello, Caroline Jones, Maureen Bonareri, Sarah N Ndegwa, Carlos McHaro, Juddy Kengo, Kevin Kinyua, Margaret M Dubeck, Katherine E Halliday, Matthew C H Jukes and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00878007 (Impact of Malaria Prevention on Health and Education in Kenyan Schoolchildren), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00878007 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Malaria Prevention on Health and Education in Kenyan Schoolchildren

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2010 to 2012Enrolled5,177ConditionsAnaemia, MalariaArmsIntermittent screening and treatment for malaria, Teacher training on literacy instruction, IST plus literacy instruction programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

George OkelloHealth Systems Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. gokello@kemri-wellcome.org
Caroline Jones
Maureen Bonareri
Sarah N Ndegwa
Carlos McHaro
Juddy Kengo
Kevin Kinyua
Margaret M Dubeck
Katherine E Halliday
Matthew C H Jukes
Sassy Molyneux
Simon J Brooker

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 092765Wellcome Trust 098045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are a number of practical and ethical issues raised in school-based health research, particularly those related to obtaining consent from parents and assent from children. One approach to developing, strengthening, and supporting appropriate consent and assent processes is through community engagement. To date, much of the literature on community engagement in biomedical research has concentrated on community- or hospital-based research, with little documentation, if any, of community engagement in school-based health research. In this paper we discuss our experiences of consent, assent and community engagement in implementing a large school-based cluster randomized trial in rural Kenya.

methodsData collected as part of a qualitative study investigating the acceptability of the main trial, focus group discussions with field staff, observations of practice and authors' experiences are used to: 1) highlight the challenges faced in obtaining assent/consent; and 2) strategies taken to try to both protect participant rights (including to refuse and to withdraw) and ensure the success of the trial.

resultsEarly meetings with national, district and local level stakeholders were important in establishing their co-operation and support for the project. Despite this support, both practical and ethical challenges were encountered during consenting and assenting procedures. Our strategy for addressing these challenges focused on improving communication and understanding of the trial, and maintaining dialogue with all the relevant stakeholders throughout the study period.

conclusionsA range of stakeholders within and beyond schools play a key role in school based health trials. Community entry and information dissemination strategies need careful planning from the outset, and with on-going consultation and feedback mechanisms established in order to identify and address concerns as they arise. We believe our experiences, and the ethical and practical issues and dilemmas encountered, will be of interest for others planning to conduct school-based research in Africa.

trial registrationNational Institute of Health NCT00878007.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInformed Consent By MinorsPovertyResearch DesignResearch SubjectsSchool Health ServicesStudentsThird-Party ConsentChildChild BehaviorCommunity-Institutional RelationsCooperative BehaviorHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterdisciplinary Communication

Identifiers

PMID23680181
PMCPMC3661351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.