SynthesisCancer science2013
Cruciferous vegetable consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
Synthesis in Cancer science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for gastric cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Broccoli Consumption and Risk of Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- Can a diet rich in Brassicaceae help controlFrontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to gastric cancer risk: A comprehensive and updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Diet and Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Risk factors for gastric cancer: A comprehensive analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Phytochemical characterization of turnip greens (Brassica rapa ssp. rapa): A systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in the first trimester and risk of cardiovascular-related malformations: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Parity and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Oncotarget · 2015Pooled it
- Dietary fat and fatty acid intake and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: evidence from epidemiological studies.Oncotarget · 2015Pooled it
- Dietary fiber intake and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- Association of fruit and vegetables with the risk of nasopharyngeal cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2014Pooled it
- Cruciferous vegetable consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.Cancer science · 2013Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Bioavailability of Glucoraphanin and Sulforaphane from High-Glucoraphanin Broccoli.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2018Trial
- A diet rich in high-glucoraphanin broccoli interacts with genotype to reduce discordance in plasma metabolite profiles by modulating mitochondrial function.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2013Trial
- A Single-Food Substitution Strategy (SFSS) Improves Fat Mass and Metabolic Parameters in MASLD: A Prospective Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Genotoxicity Studies of Indole-3-carbinol andPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevention of Gastric Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between consumption of cruciferous vegetables (CV) and risk of gastric cancer has been investigated by many studies, but remains controversial. We carried out a meta-analysis to summarize available evidence from epidemiological studies on this point. Relevant published reports of CV intake and gastric cancer were identified using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases through to the end of September 2012. We pooled the relative risk from individual studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. Sixteen case-control and six prospective studies were included in our analysis. When all studies were pooled, we yielded a significantly inverse association between CV (relative risk = 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.88) intake and gastric cancer risk, with little heterogeneity (Q = 27.27, P = 0.292, I(2) = 12.0%). Specific analysis for cabbage intake yielded similar result. When separately analyzed, case-control studies of CV intake yielded significant results and the results of prospective studies showed borderline statistical significance. Moreover, significant results were consistent for high-quality studies, for North American, European, and Asian studies, for studies on males, and for studies on non-cardia gastric cancer. Findings from this meta-analysis provide evidence that high intake of CV was inversely associated with the risk of gastric cancer and non-cardia gastric cancer in humans. Further studies on other specific CV, food preparation methods, and stratified results by anatomic cancer site and histological type should be extended in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.