Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23678965›Full record

ArticleNano letters2013

Translocating kilobase RNA through the Staphylococcal α-hemolysin nanopore.

James A Cracknell, Deanpen Japrung, Hagan Bayley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biological Nanopores: Engineering on Demand.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mimicking Ribosomal Unfolding of RNA Pseudoknot in a Protein Channel.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The evolution of nanopore sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James A CracknellDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Chemistry Research Laboratory, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom.
Deanpen Japrung
Hagan Bayley

Funding

Single-Molecule DNA Sequencing with Engineered NanoporesR01HG003709 · NHGRI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI GHADIRI, M. REZA · 2005 to 2017
$13.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrophoretic translocation of polynucleotides through nanopores may permit direct single-molecule nucleic acid sequencing. Here we describe the translocation of ssRNA heteropolymers (91-6083 bases) through the α-hemolysin nanopore. Translocation of these long ssRNAs is characterized by surprisingly long, almost complete ionic current blockades with durations averaging milliseconds per base (at +180 mV). The event durations decrease exponentially with increased transmembrane potential but are largely unaffected by the presence of urea. When the ssRNA is coupled at the 3' end to streptavidin, which cannot translocate through the pore, permanent blockades are observed, supporting our conclusion that the transient blockades arise from ssRNA translocation.

Indexed as

NanostructuresHemolysin ProteinsRNA, BacterialStaphylococcusHemolysin ProteinsRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23678965
PMCPMC3712197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.