ArticleJournal of anatomy2013
Molecular analysis of regulative events in the developing chick limb.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic association and characterization of FSTL5 in isolated clubfoot.Human molecular genetics · 2021Article
- From the Farm to the Lab: How Chicken Embryos Contribute to the Field of Teratology.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Vertebrate embryos as tools for anti-angiogenic drug screening and function.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2017Review
- Thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: history and mechanisms.Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The developing chick limb has the remarkable ability to regulate for the loss of large amounts of mesenchyme and maintain a normal limb pattern in early (Hamburger and Hamilton Stage 19; E3) limbs. How the limb can regulate for tissue loss and why this ability is lost as development proceeds (after Hamburger and Hamilton Stage 21; E3.5) is unclear. We have investigated the origins of cells involved in regulative processes and, for the first time, the molecular changes occurring, and find striking differences between developmental time points just 0.5 days apart. We demonstrate that subtle changes in cell dispersal and cell proliferation occur in HH St21 limbs but not in HH St19 limbs and also demonstrate that there is no net replacement of removed tissue at either HH St21 or St19. We further show that changes in the Fgf8/Shh/Bmp4/Gremlin signaling pathway together with the appearance of distal Hox gene activation coincide with the limbs' ability to regulate for large tissue loss. We also demonstrate that following small tissue loss, limbs can regulate for missing tissue to produce normal pattern with no net replacement of missing tissue, as seen in limbs following large tissue loss. Our results indicate the regulative ability of the limb is not due to changes in cell proliferation, cell lineage nor replacement of the missing tissue - regulative ability is reliant upon the signaling environment remaining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.