ArticleChonnam medical journal2013
Mechanical and Histopathological Comparison between Commercialized and Newly Designed Coronary Bare Metal Stents in a Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.
Article in Chonnam medical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Polymer-free Everolimus-eluting Stent in a Mid-term Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Effect of Novel Polymer-Free Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Dioxide Film-Coated Coronary Stent Loaded With Mycophenolic Acid.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Mechanical and physio-biological properties of peptide-coated stent for re-endothelialization.Biomaterials research · 2020Article
- Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Gallic Acid-Eluting Stent in a Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2018Article
- Effect of Stents Coated with Artemisinin or Dihydroartemisinin in a Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.Korean circulation journal · 2017Article
- Effect of stents coated with a combination of sirolimus and alpha-lipoic acid in a porcine coronary restenosis model.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2016Article
- Effect of a novel peptide, WKYMVm- and sirolimus-coated stent on re-endothelialization and anti-restenosis.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2015Article
- Effect of atorvastatin-eluting stents in a rabbit iliac artery restenosis model.Chonnam medical journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the stent designed by Chonnam National University Hospital (designated as CNUH) with commercial cobalt-chromium coronary stent in a porcine coronary overstretch restenosis model. CNUH stent was subjected to mechanical performance tests. Pigs were randomized into two groups in which the coronary arteries (10 pigs, 10 coronaries in each group) had either CNUH stent or control commercial bare metal stent. Histopathologic analysis was assessed at 28 days after stenting. In mechanical performance tests, CNUH stent showed 2.65N, 35.1N, 0.52N, 1.94%, 4.29% in the flat plate radial compression, radial force, 3 point bending, Foreshortening and recoil test, respectively. There was no significant difference in the injury score, internal elastic lamina (IEL), lumen area, neointima area, percent area stenosis, inflammation score and fibrin score between the two groups (1.2±0.35, 4.1±0.41 mm(2), 2.7±0.56 mm(2), 1.6±0.47 mm(2), 36.7±11.2%, 1.2±0.62, 0.2±0.34 in CNUH stent group vs. 1.2±0.38, 3.7±0.64 mm(2), 2.5±0.49 mm(2), 1.5±0.61 mm(2), 36.3±12.17%, 1.1±0.12, 0.4±0.46 in commercial stent group, respectively). In the mechanical performance test, CNUH stent showed the moderated performance under the guideline of FDA. CNUH stent demonstrated similar histological reactions compared with commercial cobalt-chromium stent in a porcine coronary overstretch restenosis model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.