Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23678117›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Prefrontal cholinergic mechanisms instigating shifts from monitoring for cues to cue-guided performance: converging electrochemical and fMRI evidence from rats and humans.

William M Howe, Anne S Berry, Jennifer Francois, Gary Gilmour, Joshua M Carp, Mark Tricklebank, Cindy Lustig, Martin Sarter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The acute effects of nicotine on corticostriatal responses to distinct phases of reward processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William M HoweDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1043, USA.
Anne S Berry
Jennifer Francois
Gary Gilmour
Joshua M Carp
Mark Tricklebank
Cindy Lustig
Martin Sarter
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINSON, TERRY E. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
Choline transporter capacity limits motivated behavior on mice, rats, and humansR01MH086530 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SARTER, MARTIN F · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS DA031656NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281NIMH NIH HHS MH086530NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported involvement of right prefrontal cholinergic activity in veridical signal detection. Here, we first recorded real-time acetylcholine release in prefrontal cortex (PFC) during specific trial sequences in rats performing a task requiring signal detection as well as rejection of nonsignal events. Cholinergic release events recorded with subsecond resolution ("transients") were observed only during signal-hit trials, not during signal-miss trials or nonsignal events. Moreover, cholinergic transients were not observed for consecutive hits; instead they were limited to signal-hit trials that were preceded by factual or perceived nonsignal events ("incongruent hits"). This finding suggests that these transients mediate shifts from a state of perceptual attention, or monitoring for cues, to cue-evoked activation of response rules and the generation of a cue-directed response. Next, to determine the translational significance of the cognitive operations supporting incongruent hits we used a version of the task previously validated for use in research in humans and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD)-functional magnetic resonance imaging. Incongruent hits activated a region in the right rostral PFC (Brodmann area 10). Furthermore, greater prefrontal activation was correlated with faster response times for incongruent hits. Finally, we measured tissue oxygen in rats, as a proxy for BOLD, and found prefrontal increases in oxygen levels solely during incongruent hits. These cross-species studies link a cholinergic response to a prefrontal BOLD activation and indicate that these interrelated mechanisms mediate the integration of external cues with internal representations to initiate and guide behavior.

Indexed as

CuesAcetylcholineAdolescentAdultAnimalsAttentionCholineFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMicroelectrodesOxygenPrefrontal CortexRatsAcetylcholineCholineOxygen

Identifiers

PMID23678117
PMCPMC3690786
OpenAlexW2167792419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.