ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Comparison of cytomegalovirus (CMV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot and CMV quantiferon gamma interferon-releasing assays in assessing risk of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A comparative performance evaluation of the VIDAS cytomegalovirus (CMV) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and T-SPOT CMV for measuring CMV-specific T-cell responses in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of two IGRA assays exploring cell-mediated immunity against CMV, BKV, and EBV in kidney transplant patients.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- A multiparameter whole blood platform for assessment of anti-CMV immunity in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Tackling CMV in Transplant Recipients: Past, Present, and Future.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Review
- Quantifying Gamma-Interferon from CMV-Specific CD8+ T Cells Defines Protection Against Clinically Significant CMV Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The Quanti-CMV Score.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Cytomegalovirus Infection After Solid Organ Transplantation: How I Use Cell-Mediated Immune Assays for Management.Viruses · 2024Review
- Article
- Cellular immunity against cytomegalovirus and risk of infection after kidney transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 interferon gamma release assay in BNT162b2 vaccinated healthcare workers.PloS one · 2024Article
- Performance Evaluation of Three Antibody Binding Assays, a Neutralizing Antibody Assay, and an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay for SARS-CoV-2 According to Vaccine Type in Vaccinated Group.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Herpes Virus Infection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention Strategies.Viruses · 2023Review
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Optimized CMV Preemptive Therapy and Antiviral Prophylaxis for CMV Disease Prevention in CMV High-Risk (D+R-) Kidney Transplant Recipients.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Contemporary Biomarkers for Renal Transplantation: A Narrative Overview.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Cytomegalovirus Specific Cell-Mediated Immunity Status in Women with Preeclampsia: A Case-Control Study.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- Cytomegalovirus Cell-Mediated Immunity: Ready for Routine Use?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Review
- Torque teno virus viremia and QuantiFERONFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infections occurring early after transplantation are risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Article
- Laboratory diagnostic testing for cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant patients.Korean journal of transplantation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) represents an appealing strategy for identifying transplant recipients at risk of infection. In this study, we compared two gamma interferon-releasing assays (IGRAs), Quantiferon-CMV and CMV enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT), to determine the ability of each test to predict protective CMV-specific T-cell responses. Two hundred twenty-one Quantiferon-CMV and ELISPOT tests were conducted on 120 adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including 100 CMV-seropositive transplant recipients (R+) and 20 CMV-seronegative transplant recipients of a CMV-positive donor (D+/R-). As a control cohort, 39 healthy adult subjects (including 33 CMV-seropositive and 6 CMV-seronegative subjects) were enrolled. CMV IgG serology was used as a reference for both tests. In the CMV-seropositive individuals, the ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV assays provided 46% concordance with the serology, 12% discordance, 18% disagreement between ELISPOT or Quantiferon-CMV and the serology, and 24% gray areas when one or both tests resulted in weak positives. None of the CMV-seronegative subjects showed detectable responses in the ELISPOT or the Quantiferon-CMV test. In transplant recipients, both the ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV assays positively correlated with each other and negatively correlated with CMV DNAemia in a significant way (P<0.05). During the antiviral prophylaxis, all 20 D+/R- KTRs we examined displayed undetectable Quantiferon-CMV and ELISPOT results, and there was no evidence of CMV seroconversion. The receiving operator curve (ROC) statistical analysis revealed similar specificities and sensitivities in predicting detectable viremia (areas under the curve [AUC], 0.66 and 0.62 for Quantiferon-CMV and ELISPOT, respectively). ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV values of >150 spots/200,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and >1 to 6 IU gamma interferon (IFN-γ) were associated with protection from CMV infection (odds ratios [OR], 5 and 8.75, respectively). In transplant recipients, the two tests displayed similar abilities for predicting CMV infection. Both the ELISPOT and Quantiferon-CMV assays require several ameliorations to avoid false-negative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.