ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013
Updating RNA-Seq analyses after re-annotation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Organ Transcriptome Response of Lumpfish (Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Identification and Validation of Reference Genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- ARSDA: A New Approach for Storing, Transmitting and Analyzing Transcriptomic Data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Information transduction capacity reduces the uncertainties in annotation-free isoform discovery and quantification.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2017Review
- Synergistically acting agonists and antagonists of G protein-coupled receptors prevent photoreceptor cell degeneration.Science signaling · 2016Article
- Ribosome profiling reveals the what, when, where and how of protein synthesis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2015Review
- Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq.Medical science monitor basic research · 2014Review
- Fragment assignment in the cloud with eXpress-D.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledThe estimation of isoform abundances from RNA-Seq data requires a time-intensive step of mapping reads to either an assembled or previously annotated transcriptome, followed by an optimization procedure for deconvolution of multi-mapping reads. These procedures are essential for downstream analysis such as differential expression. In cases where it is desirable to adjust the underlying annotation, for example, on the discovery of novel isoforms or errors in existing annotations, current pipelines must be rerun from scratch. This makes it difficult to update abundance estimates after re-annotation, or to explore the effect of changes in the transcriptome on analyses. We present a novel efficient algorithm for updating abundance estimates from RNA-Seq experiments on re-annotation that does not require re-analysis of the entire dataset. Our approach is based on a fast partitioning algorithm for identifying transcripts whose abundances may depend on the added or deleted isoforms, and on a fast follow-up approach to re-estimating abundances for all transcripts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods by showing how to synchronize RNA-Seq abundance estimates with the daily RefSeq incremental updates. Thus, we provide a practical approach to maintaining relevant databases of RNA-Seq derived abundance estimates even as annotations are being constantly revised. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our methods are implemented in software called ReXpress and are freely available, together with source code, at http://bio.math.berkeley.edu/ReXpress/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.