Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23677943›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Updating RNA-Seq analyses after re-annotation.

Adam Roberts, Lorian Schaeffer, Lior Pachter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam RobertsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Calofornia Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Lorian Schaeffer
Lior Pachter

Funding

Methods for the analysis of RNA-Seq and related sequence census based experimentsR01HG006129 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI PACHTER, LIOR S · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS NIH R01 HG006129NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe estimation of isoform abundances from RNA-Seq data requires a time-intensive step of mapping reads to either an assembled or previously annotated transcriptome, followed by an optimization procedure for deconvolution of multi-mapping reads. These procedures are essential for downstream analysis such as differential expression. In cases where it is desirable to adjust the underlying annotation, for example, on the discovery of novel isoforms or errors in existing annotations, current pipelines must be rerun from scratch. This makes it difficult to update abundance estimates after re-annotation, or to explore the effect of changes in the transcriptome on analyses. We present a novel efficient algorithm for updating abundance estimates from RNA-Seq experiments on re-annotation that does not require re-analysis of the entire dataset. Our approach is based on a fast partitioning algorithm for identifying transcripts whose abundances may depend on the added or deleted isoforms, and on a fast follow-up approach to re-estimating abundances for all transcripts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods by showing how to synchronize RNA-Seq abundance estimates with the daily RefSeq incremental updates. Thus, we provide a practical approach to maintaining relevant databases of RNA-Seq derived abundance estimates even as annotations are being constantly revised. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our methods are implemented in software called ReXpress and are freely available, together with source code, at http://bio.math.berkeley.edu/ReXpress/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMiceRNA IsoformsSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareRNA Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID23677943
PMCPMC3694665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.