ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2013
Clinical pharmacology of axitinib.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safe handling of oral antineoplastic medications: Focus on targeted therapeutics in the home setting.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2017Pooled it
- Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lucitanib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2022Trial
- Contribution of UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms related to axitinib pharmacokinetics to safety and efficacy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2018Trial
- Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of 24-h diastolic ambulatory blood pressure changes mediated by axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2015Trial
- Phase I Randomized Study of SCAI-005 Ophthalmic Solution: Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Korean Adults.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Clinical Implications ofPharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Axitinib-Pembrolizumab and Adverse Event Management in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Concurrent Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in a 61-year-old Female: Successful Treatment with Low-Dose Immunotherapy and Combination Targeted Therapy.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2026Article
- Dysregulation of innate and adaptive lymphoid immunity may have implications for symptom attribution and predict responses to targeted therapies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Article
- Prolonged exposure to axitinib alters the molecular profile of Caki-2 renal cell carcinoma cells.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A Systematic Evaluation of the Dosing Regimens for Approved Targeted Therapies and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma From a Project OPTIMUS Perspective.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
- Small-Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Modulate Glucose Handling in C2C12 Cell Line In Vitro: A Mechanistic Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Whole-Course Management Strategy for Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- The Adverse Impact of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Wound Healing and Repair.International wound journal · 2025Review
- Impact of presurgical systemic therapy on perioperative outcomes of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A Review of FDA-Approved Multi-Target Angiogenesis Drugs for Brain Tumor Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Effect of Drug-Drug Interactions on the Pharmacokinetics of Isavuconazole: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2025Review
- MAPK-targeted therapies in non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor soft tissue sarcomas: current landscape and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Non-kinase off-target inhibitory activities of clinically-relevant kinase inhibitors.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Kinome expression profiling improves risk stratification and therapeutic targeting in myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axitinib is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3 that is approved in the US and several other countries for treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of one prior systemic therapy. The recommended clinical starting dose of axitinib is 5 mg twice daily, taken with or without food. Dose increase (up to a maximum of 10 mg twice daily) or reduction is permitted based on individual tolerability. Axitinib pharmacokinetics are dose-proportional within 1-20 mg twice daily, which includes the clinical dose range. Axitinib has a short effective plasma half-life (range 2.5-6.1 h), and the plasma accumulation of axitinib is in agreement with what is expected based on the plasma half-life of the drug. Axitinib is absorbed relatively rapidly, reaching maximum observed plasma concentrations (C max) within 4 h of oral administration. The mean absolute bioavailability of axitinib is 58 %. Axitinib is highly (>99 %) bound to human plasma proteins with preferential binding to albumin and moderate binding to α1-acid glycoprotein. In patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, at the 5-mg twice-daily dose in the fed state, the geometric mean (% coefficient of variation) C max and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0-24 h (AUC24) were 27.8 ng/mL (79 %) and 265 ng·h/mL (77 %), respectively. Axitinib is metabolized primarily in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 and, to a lesser extent (<10 % each), by CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1. The two major human plasma metabolites, M12 (sulfoxide product) and M7 (glucuronide product), are considered pharmacologically inactive. Axitinib is eliminated via hepatobiliary excretion with negligible urinary excretion. Although mild hepatic impairment does not affect axitinib plasma exposures compared with subjects with normal hepatic function, there was a 2-fold increase in AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) following a single 5-mg dose in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. In the presence of ketoconazole, a strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitor, axitinib C max and AUC∞ increased by 1.5- and 2-fold, respectively, whereas co-administration of rifampin, a strong CYP3A4/5 inducer, resulted in a 71 and 79 % decrease in the C max and AUC∞, respectively. Axitinib does not inhibit CYP3A4/5, CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, or UGT1A1 at concentrations obtained with the clinical doses and is not expected to have major interactions with drugs that are metabolized by these enzymes. Axitinib is an inhibitor of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro, but is not expected to inhibit P-gp at therapeutic plasma concentrations. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption and lag time was used to describe axitinib pharmacokinetics. No clinically relevant effects of age, sex, body weight, race, renal function, UGT1A1 genotype, or CYP2C19 inferred phenotype on the clearance of axitinib were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.