Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23677573›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2013

Genome-wide association study identifies possible genetic risk factors for colorectal adenomas.

Todd L Edwards, Martha J Shrubsole, Qiuyin Cai, Guoliang Li, Qi Dai, Douglas K Rex, Thomas M Ulbright, Zhenming Fu, Ryan H Delahanty, Harvey J Murff and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aged Garlic and Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Todd L EdwardsDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. todd.l.edwards@vanderbilt.edu
Martha J Shrubsole
Qiuyin Cai
Guoliang Li
Qi Dai
Douglas K Rex
Thomas M Ulbright
Zhenming Fu
Ryan H Delahanty
Harvey J Murff
Walter Smalley
Reid M Ness
Wei Zheng
University Gastroenterology · USCenter for Human Genetics · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Understanding and Controlling p120 Dysfunction in CRCP50CA095103 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COFFEY, ROBERT J. · 2002 to 2017
$33.6M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) KL2KL2RR024977 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Genetic and Endocrine Pathways Linking Obesity with Prostate CancerR01CA121060 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FOWKE, JAY H. · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Dietary Calcium and Magnesium, Genetics, and Colorectal AdenomaR01AT004660 · NCCIH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAI, QI · 2008 to 2011
$2.1M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT004660NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT004660NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P30 CA 68485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095103NCI NIH HHS P50CA95103NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121060NCI NIH HHS R01CA121060NCRR NIH HHS 5KL2RR024977NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death, and most colorectal cancer usually arises from colorectal adenomas. Removal of polyps reduces mortality from colorectal cancer. Colorectal adenomas are known to aggregate in families; however, the genetic determinants for risk of polyps are largely unknown.

methodsIn this study, we used data from the Tennessee Colorectal Polyp Study and the Tennessee-Indiana Adenoma Recurrence Study to conduct a GWAS of adenoma cases and controls. Our design consisted of discovery and replication phases for a total of 2,551 Caucasian adenoma cases and 3,285 Caucasian controls. We carried out logistic regression to test for association in both the discovery and replication phase and further examined the results with meta-analysis.

resultsNo single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) achieved a genome-wide significant P value; however, the most significantly associated SNPs were either previously associated with colorectal cancer in GWAS, such as rs10505477 in the gene POU5F1 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.94; P = 4.4 × 10(-4)), or have been biologically linked to benign growths in other tissues, such as rs1919314 in the gene histone deacetylase 9 (OR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.47; P = 1.1 × 10(-6)).

conclusionsThis study suggests that several SNPs may be related to adenoma risk and provides clues for future studies. IMPACT: These results suggest that some known genetic risk factors of colorectal cancer are necessary but not sufficient for carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

AdenomaAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsTennessee

Identifiers

PMID23677573
PMCPMC3716448
OpenAlexW2149054645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.