Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23677313›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2013

Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Ingrid Nygaard, Linda Brubaker, Halina M Zyczynski, Geoffrey Cundiff, Holly Richter, Marie Gantz, Paul Fine, Shawn Menefee, Beri Ridgeway, Anthony Visco and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00099372 (Long-term Effectiveness of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse), which is not on this map. Cited by 240 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
35.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00099372 terminatednot on this map

Long-term Effectiveness of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Extended Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (E-CARE) Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkRan2004 to 2011Enrolled215ConditionsProlapse, Urinary Incontinence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 539 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Mid- to Long-Term Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results of Two Prolapse Surgeries for Apical Defect: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Trial
  16. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingrid NygaardUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. ingrid.nygaard@hsc.utah.edu
Linda Brubaker
Halina M Zyczynski
Geoffrey Cundiff
Holly Richter
Marie Gantz
Paul Fine
Shawn Menefee
Beri Ridgeway
Anthony Visco
Lauren Klein Warren
Min Zhang
Susan Meikle
RTI International · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USKaiser Permanente · USLoyola University Chicago · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Pelvic floor Disorders Network-Data Coordinating CenterU01HD041249 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEI, JOHN T · 2001 to 2010
$19.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center (U01)U01HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GANTZ, MARIE G · 2011 to 2015
$19.7M
Perioperative Pelvic Floor Rehab: A Rrandomized TrialU10HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2015
$5.1M
UNC Pelvic Floor Disorders Research CollaborativeU10HD041267 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VISCO, ANTHONY G · 2001 to 2015
$5.0M
The Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD041250 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2015
$3.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
The Cleveland Clinic Clinical SiteU10HD054215 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARBER, MATTHEW D · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) Clinical SiteUG1HD041267 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAZEMA Y SIDDIQUI · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
Pittsburgh Collab Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery ProgramU10HD041263 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2001 to 2005
$2.3M
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)U10HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHAFFER, JOSEPH I · 2006 to 2015
$1.9M
Pittsburgh Pelvic Floor Research ProgramU10HD069006 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
UTAH PELVIC FLOOR DISORDERS NETWORKU10HD054136 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NYGAARD, INGRID E · 2006 to 2015
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD041249NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD41249NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041250NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041263NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054136NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054215NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054241NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD41250NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD41261NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD41267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD54136NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD54214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD54215NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD54241NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceMore than 225 000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the most durable POP surgery, but little is known about safety and long-term effectiveness.

objectivesTo describe anatomic and symptomatic outcomes up to 7 years after abdominal sacrocolpopexy, and to determine whether these are affected by concomitant anti-incontinence surgery (Burch urethropexy). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsLong-term follow-up of the randomized, masked 2-year Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial of women with stress continence who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy between 2002 and 2005 for symptomatic POP and also received either concomitant Burch urethropexy or no urethropexy. Ninety-two percent (215/233) of eligible 2-year CARE trial completers were enrolled in the extended CARE study; and 181 (84%) and 126 (59%) completed 5 and 7 years of follow-up, respectively. The median follow-up was 7 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Symptomatic POP failure requiring retreatment or self-reported bulge; or anatomic POP failure requiring retreatment or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification evaluation demonstrating descent of the vaginal apex below the upper third of the vagina, or anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse beyond the hymen. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with more than 1 symptom or interval treatment; or overall UI score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index.

resultsBy year 7, the estimated probabilities of treatment failure (POP, SUI, UI) from parametric survival modeling for the urethropexy group and the no urethropexy group, respectively, were 0.27 and 0.22 for anatomic POP (treatment difference of 0.050; 95% CI, -0.161 to 0.271), 0.29 and 0.24 for symptomatic POP (treatment difference of 0.049; 95% CI, -0.060 to 0.162), 0.48 and 0.34 for composite POP (treatment difference of 0.134; 95% CI, -0.096 to 0.322), 0.62 and 0.77 for SUI (treatment difference of -0.153; 95% CI, -0.268 to 0.030), and 0.75 and 0.81 for overall UI (treatment difference of -0.064; 95% CI, -0.161 to 0.032). Mesh erosion probability at 7 years (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.8% to 16.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: During 7 years of follow-up, abdominal sacrocolpopexy failure rates increased in both groups. Urethropexy prevented SUI longer than no urethropexy. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy effectiveness should be balanced with long-term risks of mesh or suture erosion.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00099372.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLongitudinal LigamentsMiddle AgedPelvic Floor DisordersPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsRiskSurgical MeshTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeUrethraUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID23677313
PMCPMC3747840
OpenAlexW2092649725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.