Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23677018›Full record

ReviewSexually transmitted diseases2013

Biological markers of sexual activity: tools for improving measurement in HIV/sexually transmitted infection prevention research.

Maria F Gallo, Markus J Steiner, Marcia M Hobbs, Lee Warner, Denise J Jamieson, Maurizio Macaluso

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Behavioral interventions for improving dual-method contraceptive use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Behavioral interventions for improving condom use for dual protection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maria F GalloDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA. mgallo@cdc.gov
Markus J Steiner
Marcia M Hobbs
Lee Warner
Denise J Jamieson
Maurizio Macaluso
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USFamily Health International 360 · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USOffice of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Trichomonas Typing SystemU19AI031496 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SPARLING, PHILIP FREDERICK · 1995 to 2014
$24.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI031496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on interventions to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is heavily influenced by participant reporting of sexual behavior, despite uncertainty about its validity. Exclusive reliance on participant self-report often is based, overtly or by implication, on 4 assumptions: (1) no feasible alternatives exist; (2) misreporting can be minimized to levels that can be disregarded; (3) misreporting tends to underreport sensitive behaviors; and (4) misreporting tends to be nondifferential with respect to the groups being compared. The objective of this review are to evaluate these assumptions, including a review of studies using semen biomarkers to evaluate the validity of self-reported data, and to make recommendations for applying biological markers of semen exposure detectable in women to further strengthen research on HIV/STI prevention. Increasing evidence shows that semen biomarkers provide an important means of assessing and augmenting the validity of studies on HIV/STI prevention. Additional biomarkers are needed to assess male exposure to vaginal sex and both male and female exposure to anal sex. Methods and study designs that incorporate biomarkers into studies collecting self-reported behavioral data should be considered where possible.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFemaleHealth Services ResearchHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSelf ReportSemenSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23677018
PMCPMC3812692
OpenAlexW2048504124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.