Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23676093›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Structural and functional annotation of the porcine immunome.

Harry D Dawson, Jane E Loveland, Géraldine Pascal, James G R Gilbert, Hirohide Uenishi, Katherine M Mann, Yongming Sang, Jie Zhang, Denise Carvalho-Silva, Toby Hunt and 40 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Contributions of large and agricultural animal models to immunology.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Generation of RAG2 Knockout Immune-Deficient Miniature Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

50 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.

Harry D DawsonUSDA-ARS, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Diet, Genomics, Immunology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Jane E Loveland
Géraldine Pascal
James G R Gilbert
Hirohide Uenishi
Katherine M Mann
Yongming Sang
Jie Zhang
Denise Carvalho-Silva
Toby Hunt
Matthew Hardy
Zhiliang Hu
Shu-Hong Zhao
Anna Anselmo
Hiroki Shinkai
Celine Chen
Bouabid Badaoui
Daniel Berman
Clara Amid
Mike Kay
David Lloyd
Catherine Snow
Takeya Morozumi
Ryan Pei-Yen Cheng
Megan Bystrom
Ronan Kapetanovic
John C Schwartz
Ranjit Kataria
Matthew Astley
Eric Fritz
Charles Steward
Mark Thomas
Laurens Wilming
Daisuke Toki
Alan L Archibald
Bertrand Bed'Hom
Dario Beraldi
Ting-Hua Huang
Tahar Ait-Ali
Frank Blecha
Sara Botti
Tom C Freeman
Elisabetta Giuffra
David A Hume
Joan K Lunney
Michael P Murtaugh
James M Reecy
Jennifer L Harrow
Claire Rogel-Gaillard
Christopher K Tuggle
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBIowa State University · USRoslin Institute · GBAgricultural Research Service · USGénétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative · FRParco Tecnologico Padano · ITBeltsville Human Nutrition Research Center · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBHuazhong Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences · JPKansas State University · USMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries · JPUniversity of Minnesota · USNational Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources · INPhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements · FR

Funding

TRANSEPITHELIAL ION TRANSPORT &ITS REGULATIONP20RR017686 · NCRR · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MELGAREJO GARCIA, LUIS TONATIUH · 2002 to 2011
$21.8M
Minnesota Training Program in VirologyT32AI083196 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Louis M Mansky · 2010 to 2026
$3.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010520/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010520/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G004013/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025328/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211552Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20251969Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council EC FP6NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR017686NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI083196NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI83196Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe domestic pig is known as an excellent model for human immunology and the two species share many pathogens. Susceptibility to infectious disease is one of the major constraints on swine performance, yet the structure and function of genes comprising the pig immunome are not well-characterized. The completion of the pig genome provides the opportunity to annotate the pig immunome, and compare and contrast pig and human immune systems.

resultsThe Immune Response Annotation Group (IRAG) used computational curation and manual annotation of the swine genome assembly 10.2 (Sscrofa10.2) to refine the currently available automated annotation of 1,369 immunity-related genes through sequence-based comparison to genes in other species. Within these genes, we annotated 3,472 transcripts. Annotation provided evidence for gene expansions in several immune response families, and identified artiodactyl-specific expansions in the cathelicidin and type 1 Interferon families. We found gene duplications for 18 genes, including 13 immune response genes and five non-immune response genes discovered in the annotation process. Manual annotation provided evidence for many new alternative splice variants and 8 gene duplications. Over 1,100 transcripts without porcine sequence evidence were detected using cross-species annotation. We used a functional approach to discover and accurately annotate porcine immune response genes. A co-expression clustering analysis of transcriptomic data from selected experimental infections or immune stimulations of blood, macrophages or lymph nodes identified a large cluster of genes that exhibited a correlated positive response upon infection across multiple pathogens or immune stimuli. Interestingly, this gene cluster (cluster 4) is enriched for known general human immune response genes, yet contains many un-annotated porcine genes. A phylogenetic analysis of the encoded proteins of cluster 4 genes showed that 15% exhibited an accelerated evolution as compared to 4.1% across the entire genome.

conclusionsThis extensive annotation dramatically extends the genome-based knowledge of the molecular genetics and structure of a major portion of the porcine immunome. Our complementary functional approach using co-expression during immune response has provided new putative immune response annotation for over 500 porcine genes. Our phylogenetic analysis of this core immunome cluster confirms rapid evolutionary change in this set of genes, and that, as in other species, such genes are important components of the pig's adaptation to pathogen challenge over evolutionary time. These comprehensive and integrated analyses increase the value of the porcine genome sequence and provide important tools for global analyses and data-mining of the porcine immune response.

Indexed as

GenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsCattleEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationHumansImmunityImmunoglobulinsMiceModels, MolecularProtein ConformationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, KIRSelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificityImmunoglobulinsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, KIR

Identifiers

PMID23676093
PMCPMC3658956
OpenAlexW2143368483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.