ArticleGenetic epidemiology2013
On association analysis of rare variants under population substructure: an approach for the detection of subjects that can cause bias in the analysis--T opt: an outlier detection method.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the analysis of rare-variant data in population-based designs, we propose a method to detect study subjects that may create population substructure in the study sample. Our approach is computationally fast and simple, permitting applications to whole-genome sequencing studies. The method does not require the variants to be in linkage equilibrium and can be applied to all the genetic loci that are available in the study. For both rare and common variants, we assess the performance of our approach by its application to the 1000 Genome Project data, and in simulation studies. The results are compared to the commonly used outlier detection algorithm based on principal component analysis (PCA). The statistical power of both approaches to detect outliers are comparable in most of the scenarios, but the power of PCA to detect outliers is lower than the novel approach in the presence of linkage disequilibrium and for subpopulations that are genetically similar. The data analysis and the simulation studies suggest that the number of false-positive results appears to be different for the two approaches. Our approach maintains the type I error rate while the outlier detection approach based on PCA does not. Taking additionally into account the minimal computational requirements of our approach and the ability to incorporate all the marker information, the proposed method will have important application in sequencing studies and genome-wide association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.