Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23674289›Full record

Trial reportMuscle & nerve2013

The 6-minute walk test and other clinical endpoints in duchenne muscular dystrophy: reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal clinically important differences from a multicenter study.

Craig M McDonald, Erik K Henricson, R Ted Abresch, Julaine Florence, Michelle Eagle, Eduard Gappmaier, Allan M Glanzman, PTC124-GD-007-DMD Study Group, Robert Spiegel, Jay Barth and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Muscle & nerve, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07502989 (Convenient Quantification of Myopathic Change in Muscle Via Electrical Impedance Myography), which is not on this map. Cited by 175 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07502989 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Convenient Quantification of Myopathic Change in Muscle Via Electrical Impedance Myography

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsMyopathy, Muscular Dystrophies, Myositis, Myofibrillar MyopathyArmsElectrical Impedance Myography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 349 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Characterizing health state utilities associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Early phase 2 trial of TAS-205 in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020
    Trial

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig M McDonaldDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neuromuscular Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California, 95817, USA.
Erik K Henricson
R Ted Abresch
Julaine Florence
Michelle Eagle
Eduard Gappmaier
Allan M Glanzman
PTC124-GD-007-DMD Study Group
Robert Spiegel
Jay Barth
Gary Elfring
Allen Reha
Stuart W Peltz
PTC Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of California, Davis · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Utah · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000608/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn international clinical trial enrolled 174 ambulatory males ≥5 years old with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Pretreatment data provide insight into reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and other endpoints.

methodsScreening and baseline evaluations included the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), timed function tests (TFTs), quantitative strength by myometry, the PedsQL, heart rate-determined energy expenditure index, and other exploratory endpoints.

resultsThe 6MWT proved feasible and reliable in a multicenter context. Concurrent validity with other endpoints was excellent. The MCID for 6MWD was 28.5 and 31.7 meters based on 2 statistical distribution methods.

conclusionsThe ratio of MCID to baseline mean is lower for 6MWD than for other endpoints. The 6MWD is an optimal primary endpoint for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) clinical trials that are focused therapeutically on preservation of ambulation and slowing of disease progression.

Indexed as

Exercise TestOutcome Assessment, Health CareDisease ProgressionHeart RateHumansMaleMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneOxadiazolesReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsWalkingatalurenOxadiazoles6-minute walk testambulationDuchenne muscular dystrophyenergy expenditure indexmuscular dystrophymyometrynatural historyPedsQLtimed function test

Identifiers

PMID23674289
PMCPMC3826053
OpenAlexW1951817210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.