Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23674003›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Intranodal cystic changes: a potential radiologic signature/biomarker to assess the human papillomavirus status of cases with oropharyngeal malignancies.

Ajaykumar C Morani, Avraham Eisbruch, Thomas E Carey, Samantha J Hauff, Heather M Walline, Suresh K Mukherji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ajaykumar C MoraniDepartment of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA. ajaycmorani@yahoo.com
Avraham Eisbruch
Thomas E Carey
Samantha J Hauff
Heather M Walline
Suresh K Mukherji

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Therapeutic Potential and Mechanism of Action of Potent Small Molecule InhibitorsP50CA097248 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOLF, GREGORY T · 2002 to 2013
$25.3M
Training Program in Tumor MicroenvironmentT32CA009676 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Maria G Castro, Analisa Virginia DiFeo · 1992 to 2026
$7.3M
Biomarkers to Guide Treatment and Improve Survival in Oral/Oropharyngeal CancerR01DE019126 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAREY, THOMAS E. · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA46592NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097248NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009676NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019126PHS HHS P50 CADE97248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine if lymph node imaging findings can predict human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment postcontrast neck computed tomographic scans of 49 patients (male, 35; female, 14; age range, 45-76 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal malignancies and with available HPV data were retrospectively reviewed. Metastatic lymph nodes were identified based on standardly accepted size and morphological criteria. Various lymph node parameters were studied, including presence of cystic foci in the metastatic lymph nodes, abnormal lymph nodes showing low-attenuation foci, matted lymph nodes, and morphologically normal smaller (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes. These parameters were then independently correlated with the available HPV status of these patients. Finally, an extended criterion, that is, intranodal cystic changes in cases with morphologically normal small (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes, was correlated with HPV status. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated.

resultsOf these 49 cases with oropharyngeal cancers, 27 were HPV positive, and 22 cases were HPV negative. Eight cases (3 HPV positive and 5 HPV negative) did not have metastatic lymph nodes. Of remaining 41 cases with metastatic abnormal lymph nodes, 26 were HPV positive, and 15 were HPV negative. Of these 41 cases with metastatic lymph nodes, 14 had 1 or more lymph nodes with cystic foci. Of these 14 cases, 10 (71.4%) were HPV positive. Resultant sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of cystic foci for the presence of HPV status were 38.4%, 73.3%, 71.4%, and 40.7%, respectively. Intranodal cystic changes in cases with morphologically normal small (<1.5 cm) lymph nodes were found in 5 cases; all 5 were HPV positive. Resultant accuracy was specificity and PPV of 100%, sensitivity of 19.2% and NPV of 41.6%.

conclusionsIntranodal cystic changes seen on the pretreatment postcontrast neck computed tomographic scan of patients with oropharyngeal malignancies are radiologic signatures strongly associated with the HPV status of the patient. The results in this initial study warrant larger prospective studies to determine if this finding may be used in addition to other molecular biomarkers to help identify those patients who may be amenable to the most appropriate treatment options.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedBiomarkersCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23674003
PMCPMC3658148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.