Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23673789›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2014

Non-cigarette tobacco and the lung.

Michael Schivo, Mark V Avdalovic, Susan Murin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Poly-tobacco use among HIV-positive smokers: implications for smoking cessation efforts.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Trial
  4. Reply to LiAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Etiology of lung cancer: Evidence from epidemiologic studies.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pulmonary Abnormalities in Young, Light-Use Waterpipe (Hookah) Smokers.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SchivoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, 4150 V Street, No. 3400, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Mark V Avdalovic
Susan Murin
University of California, Davis · USVA Northern California Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is known to cause a wide range of damaging health outcomes; however, the effects of non-cigarette tobacco products are either unknown or perceived as less harmful than cigarettes. Smokeless tobacco, cigar smoking, and waterpipe smoking have increased in usage over the past few decades. Some experts believe that their use is reaching epidemic proportions. Factors such as a perception of harm reduction, targeted advertising, and unrecognized addiction may drive the increased consumption of non-cigarette tobacco products. In particular, the need for social acceptance, enjoyment of communal smoking activities, and exotic nature of waterpipe smoking fuels, in part, its popularity. The public is looking for "safer" alternatives to smoking cigarettes, and some groups advertise products such as smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes as the alternatives they seek. Though it is clear that cigar and waterpipe tobacco smoking are probably as dangerous to health as cigarette smoking, there is an opinion among users that the health risks are less compared to cigarette smoking. This is particularly true in younger age groups. In the cases of smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes, the risks to health are less clear and there may be evidence of a harm reduction compared to cigarettes. In this article, we discuss commonly used forms of non-cigarette tobacco products, their impacts on lung health, and relevant controversies surrounding their use.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBronchitis, ChronicClinical Trials as TopicHumansLungLung NeoplasmsTobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use DisorderYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23673789
OpenAlexW2049567534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.