Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23673645›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans.

Guo-dong Wang, Weiwei Zhai, He-chuan Yang, Ruo-xi Fan, Xue Cao, Li Zhong, Lu Wang, Fei Liu, Hong Wu, Lu-guang Cheng and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PCR-based detection of hereditary mutations inJournal of veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Guo-dong WangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 32 Jiaochang Donglu, Kunming 650223, China.
Weiwei Zhai
He-chuan Yang
Ruo-xi Fan
Xue Cao
Li Zhong
Lu Wang
Fei Liu
Hong Wu
Lu-guang Cheng
Andrei D Poyarkov
Nikolai A Poyarkov
Shu-sheng Tang
Wen-ming Zhao
Yun Gao
Xue-mei Lv
David M Irwin
Peter Savolainen
Chung-I Wu
Ya-ping Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic bases of demographic changes and artificial selection underlying domestication are of great interest in evolutionary biology. Here we perform whole-genome sequencing of multiple grey wolves, Chinese indigenous dogs and dogs of diverse breeds. Demographic analysis show that the split between wolves and Chinese indigenous dogs occurred 32,000 years ago and that the subsequent bottlenecks were mild. Therefore, dogs may have been under human selection over a much longer time than previously concluded, based on molecular data, perhaps by initially scavenging with humans. Population genetic analysis identifies a list of genes under positive selection during domestication, which overlaps extensively with the corresponding list of positively selected genes in humans. Parallel evolution is most apparent in genes for digestion and metabolism, neurological process and cancer. Our study, for the first time, draws together humans and dogs in their recent genomic evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsSelection, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, DomesticChinaDogsGene OntologyGenetic Association StudiesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGeographyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPopulation DynamicsPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23673645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.