Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23673603›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2013

Effect of a course-based intervention and effect of medical regulation on physicians' opioid prescribing.

Meldon Kahan, Tara Gomes, David N Juurlink, Michael Manno, Lynn Wilson, Angela Mailis-Gagnon, Anita Srivastava, Rhoda Reardon, Irfan A Dhalla, Muhammad M Mamdani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluations of Continuing Health Provider Education Focused on Opioid Prescribing: A Scoping Review.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meldon KahanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto (U of T), Ontario, Canada. meldon.kahan@wchospital.ca
Tara Gomes
David N Juurlink
Michael Manno
Lynn Wilson
Angela Mailis-Gagnon
Anita Srivastava
Rhoda Reardon
Irfan A Dhalla
Muhammad M Mamdani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effects of an intensive 2-day course on physicians' prescribing of opioids.

designPopulation-based retrospective observational study.

settingCollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) in Toronto.

participantsOntario physicians who took the course between April 1, 2000, and May 30, 2008.

interventionA 2-day opioid-prescribing course with a maximum of 12 physician participants. Educational methods included didactic presentations, case discussions, and standardized patients. A detailed syllabus and office materials were provided.

main outcome measuresParticipants were matched with control physicians using specific variables. The primary outcome was the rate of opioid prescribing, expressed as milligrams of morphine equivalent per quarter.

resultsOne hundred thirty-eight course participants (120 family physicians, 15 specialists, and 3 physicians whose status was uncertain) were eligible for analysis. Of these, 68.1% were self-referred and 31.9% were referred by the CPSO. Overall, among physicians referred by the CPSO, the rate of opioid prescribing decreased dramatically in the year before course participation compared with matched control physicians. The course had no added effect on the rate of physicians' opioid prescribing in the subsequent 2 years. There was no statistically significant effect on the rate of opioid prescribing observed among the self-referred physicians. Among 15 of the self-referred physicians who, owing to the high quantities of opioids they prescribed, were not matched with control physicians, the rate of opioid prescribing decreased by 43.9% in the year following course completion.

conclusionPhysicians markedly reduced the quantities of opioids they prescribed after medical regulators referred them to an opioid-prescribing course. The course itself did not lead to significant additional reductions; however, a subgroup of physicians who prescribed high quantities of opioids might have responded to what was taught in the course.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingAdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID23673603
PMCPMC3653672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.