ArticlePharmaceutical research2013
The co-delivery of oxaliplatin abrogates the immunogenic response to PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Repeat Administration of Lipoplexes on Gene Delivery, Biodistribution, and Cytokine Response in Immunocompetent Tumor-Bearing Mice.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Article
- Cytotoxic Potential, Metabolic Profiling, and Liposomes ofInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- The Use of Lactose as an Alternative Coating for Nanoparticles.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020Article
- Nonadditive Effects of Repetitive Administration of Lipoplexes in Immunocompetent Mice.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2017Article
- Pre-clinical immunotoxicity studies of nanotechnology-formulated drugs: Challenges, considerations and strategy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn vivo application of siRNA/PEGylated cationic liposome complex (lipoplex) is impeded by two main obstacles: cytokine responses and anti-PEG IgM responses to PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex. Here, we investigated whether co-administration of oxaliplatin (l-OHP) abrogates the cytokine release and anti-PEG IgM production by PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex.
methodsFree l-OHP was administered either simultaneously or 30 min prior to PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex administration, and cytokine response and anti-PEG IgM production were evaluated. In addition, the effect of the liposomal encapsulation of l-OHP on the immunogenic response of PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex was investigated.
resultsSimultaneous co-administration of free l-OHP with PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex caused a significant reduction in anti-PEG IgM production, along with an increase in the cytokine response. Free l-OHP injected prior to the lipoplex injection, however, successfully reduced cytokine release and anti-PEG IgM response. Platination of siRNA by simultaneously administered free l-OHP might facilitate the dissociation of double-stranded siRNA to single-stranded siRNA, resulting in the inducement of a potent immuno-stimulation of siRNA via endosomal toll-like receptors (TLRs). On the other hand, encapsulation of l-OHP into the siRNA-lipoplex resulted in a reduction of both anti-PEG IgM production and cytokine responses.
conclusionsOur results suggest that, besides the expected therapeutic efficacy of co-administration, encapsulation of l-OHP into the PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex has great potential for minimizing the immunostimulation of PEGylated siRNA-lipoplex, resulting in a safe, applicable, and compliant treatment regimen for sequential clinical administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.