Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23672542›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2013

Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC.

Bruce N Cuthbert, Thomas R Insel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02410954 (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,273 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,273citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02410954 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as a Treatment for Acute Fear

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2015 to 2019Enrolled14ConditionsFearArmsNeuroConn Direct Current stimulator Multiple Channel -4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,273 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluating the Validity of Model Organisms: A Review and a New Framework for Biologists.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Schizophrenia, variability, and the Anna Karenina principle.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

1,213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bruce N CuthbertNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, MSC 9632, Room 7121, Bethesda, MD 20892-9632, USA. bcuthber@mail.nih.gov
Thomas R Insel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent diagnostic systems for mental disorders rely upon presenting signs and symptoms, with the result that current definitions do not adequately reflect relevant neurobiological and behavioral systems--impeding not only research on etiology and pathophysiology but also the development of new treatments. DISCUSSION: The National Institute of Mental Health began the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project in 2009 to develop a research classification system for mental disorders based upon dimensions of neurobiology and observable behavior. RDoC supports research to explicate fundamental biobehavioral dimensions that cut across current heterogeneous disorder categories. We summarize the rationale, status and long-term goals of RDoC, outline challenges in developing a research classification system (such as construct validity and a suitable process for updating the framework) and discuss seven distinct differences in conception and emphasis from current psychiatric nosologies. SUMMARY: Future diagnostic systems cannot reflect ongoing advances in genetics, neuroscience and cognitive science until a literature organized around these disciplines is available to inform the revision efforts. The goal of the RDoC project is to provide a framework for research to transform the approach to the nosology of mental disorders.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHumansMental DisordersPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID23672542
PMCPMC3653747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.