Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23672400›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2013

Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial.

Annalisa Monaco, Fabrizio Sgolastra, Davide Pietropaoli, Mario Giannoni, Ruggero Cattaneo

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01832207 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison Between Sensory and Motor Transcutaneous Electrical Nervous Stimulation on Electromyographic and Kinesiographic Activity of Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder: a Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of L'AquilaRan2010 to 2012Enrolled60ConditionsTemporomandibular DisordersArmsTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
NCT02789085 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

ANS Effects of ULF-TENS Stimulation in Patients With and Without TMD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of L'AquilaRan2013Enrolled200ConditionsTEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISEASESArmsULF TENS stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A Device Improves Signs and Symptoms of TMD.Pain research & management · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annalisa MonacoUniversity of L'Aquila Department of Health Sciences, Via Vetoio 1, Italy, L'Aquila 67100, Italy. annalisamonaco@yahoo.it
Fabrizio Sgolastra
Davide Pietropaoli
Mario Giannoni
Ruggero Cattaneo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the present controlled clinical trial was to assess the effect of a single 60 min application of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) at sensory stimulation threshold (STS), compared to the application of motor stimulation threshold (MTS) as well as to untreatment, on the surface electromyographic (sEMG) and kinesiographic activity of patients with tempormanbibular disorder (TMD).

methodsSixty female subjects, selected according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, suffering from unilateral TMD in remission were assigned to MTS, STS or untreatment. Pre- and post-treatment differences in the sEMG activity of temporalis anterior (TA), masseter (MM), digastric (DA) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM), as well in the interocclusal distance (ID), within group were tested using the Wilcoxon test, while differences among groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test; the level of significance was set at p≤0.05.

resultsSignificant pre- and post-treatment differences were observed in MTS and STS groups, for TA and MM of both sides; no significant difference was detected between MTS and STS groups. Kinesiographic results showed that the vertical component of ID was significantly increased after TENS in MTS and STS groups.

conclusionsSTS TENS could be effective, as well as MTS, in reduce the sEMG activity of masticatory muscles and to improve the ID of TMD patients in remission. Future studies are needed to confirm the results of the present study. Clinical relevance. The present study demonstrates that the application of TENS is effective in reduce the sEMG activity, as well as in increasing the ID of patients with TMD; our study did not support superior effectiveness of MTS or STS.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01832207.

Indexed as

AdultEvoked Potentials, MotorEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansMasticatory MusclesMuscle ContractionSensory ThresholdsTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23672400
PMCPMC3660267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.