ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2013
Psychotraumatology in the Netherlands.
Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the Global Post Trauma Symptom Scale-Uganda among trauma-affected adults.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- MDMA for treatment of PTSD and neurorehabilitation in military populations.NeuroRehabilitation · 2024Review
- Article
- Trauma and trauma care in Europe.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2018Review
- Trauma treatment across Europe: where do we stand now from a perspective of seven countries.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2016Article
- Trauma research in the Baltic countries: from political oppression to recovery.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2016Article
- Psychotrauma research in the Netherlands.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2013Article
- European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT): three years as an Open Access journal.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2013Article
- ESTSS and ISTSS: "heterozygous twins".European journal of psychotraumatology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The contribution to psychotrauma literature from Dutch authors has a long tradition. The relatively high lifetime prevalence of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is not unique for the Netherlands and does not fully explain the interest in trauma and its consequences. In this overview of psychotraumatology in the Netherlands, we will discuss some of the key events and processes that contribute to the current interest. We outlined the historical basis and development of the field in the Netherlands, including the impact of World War II, the effects of major man-made or natural disasters, engagement in military conflicts, as well as smaller scale traumatic events like sexual abuse and traffic accidents. The liberal and open culture may have reduced stigma to trauma, while other sociocultural aspects may have contributed to increased prevalence. Finally, we describe Dutch psychotraumatology today and how history and culture have shaped the current scientific basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.