Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23671060›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2013

Reflections on developing collaborative research in pediatric psychology: implications and future directions.

Dennis Drotar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dennis DrotarDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. dennis.drotar@cchmc.org

Funding

Enhancing treatment adherence and health outcomesT32HD068223 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Kevin Hommel, Meghan Eileen McGrady · 2012 to 2026
$3.6M
Patient Preferences and Adherence in Adolescents and Young Adults with CancerK07CA200668 · NCI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGRADY, MEGHAN EILEEN · 2016 to 2020
$724k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA200668NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD068223NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD069223-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCollaborative research with pediatric colleagues has become increasingly important in the professional agenda of pediatric psychology, and there is a continuing need to articulate the challenges of such research. To address this need, this article describes types of collaborative research, reasons for collaboration, collaborative process, challenges, and strategies to facilitate collaborative research.

methodsExperiences and lessons learned over the course of a career in collaborative research are described.

resultsChallenges in collaborative research can be overcome by effective strategies of engagement and communication. Useful methods of training researchers in collaborative research include modeling and supervised mentored experiences in research initiated by trainees.

conclusionData are needed to identify the characteristics of successful collaborative research, strategies to promote effective research, and methods of training and career development.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorBiomedical ResearchChildHumansPsychology, Childcollaborative researchinterdisciplinary researchresearch training

Identifiers

PMID23671060
PMCPMC3888255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.