Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23670894›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2013

Guideline adherence of antithrombotic treatment initiated by general practitioners in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Danish survey.

Axel Brandes, Mikkel Overgaard, Liane Plauborg, Christian Dehlendorff, Frede Lyck, Jørgen Peulicke, Søren Vinther Poulsen, Steen Husted

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Inappropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants prescriptions: be cautious with dose reductions.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2019
    Article
  6. Atrial fibrillation is highly prevalent yet undertreated in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Axel BrandesDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. axel.brandes@rsyd.dk
Mikkel Overgaard
Liane Plauborg
Christian Dehlendorff
Frede Lyck
Jørgen Peulicke
Søren Vinther Poulsen
Steen Husted
Boehringer Ingelheim (Denmark) · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this prospective survey was to describe the demographics, stroke risk profile, and the guideline adherence of antithrombotic treatment in a Danish primary care population of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that a significant proportion of patients with nonvalvular AF do not receive guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment in primary care.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional survey of antithrombotic treatment using data of AF patients from general practices.

resultsSixty-four general practitioners enrolled 1743 patients with a mean age of 74.8 ± 11.2 years. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores were 1.9 ± 1.3 and 3.5 ± 1.8, respectively. Of the patients, 12.4% and 4.04%, respectively, were at truly low risk, with a CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score 0 (P < 0.001). A score of 1 was seen in 28.0% vs 9.0% (P < 0.001) of the patients. Of all patients, 66.3% were treated with oral anticoagulants, 18.7% with antiplatelet drugs only, and 15% received no antithrombotic therapy. Based on the CHADS2 score, 75.7% of the patients were treated in adherence with the guidelines, 16% were undertreated, and 8.4% overtreated. The corresponding numbers for the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were 75.4%, 22.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. The differences in guideline adherence applying the 2 scores were significant (P < 0.001). Of patients receiving no antithrombotic therapy, 64.1% were treated in adherence to the guidelines according to the CHADS2 score. Applying the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, this proportion was only 53.4%. Antiplatelet drug treatment was in adherence to the guidelines (CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score of 1) in only 31% and 12% of the patients, respectively.

conclusionsAntithrombotic treatment of AF patients is in general well performed in primary care in Denmark. Further improvements may be achieved by thorough stroke risk stratification on the basis of current evidence-based guidelines.

Indexed as

General PractitionersGuideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkDrug Utilization ReviewFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHealth Care SurveysAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23670894
PMCPMC6649568
OpenAlexW1599434682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.