Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23670660›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2013

Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Anne Kennedy, Peter Bower, David Reeves, Tom Blakeman, Robert Bowen, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Martin Eden, Catherine Fullwood, Hannah Gaffney, Caroline Gardner and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 28 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Self-management for bronchiectasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anne KennedyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. a.kennedy@soton.ac.uk
Peter Bower
David Reeves
Tom Blakeman
Robert Bowen
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Martin Eden
Catherine Fullwood
Hannah Gaffney
Caroline Gardner
Victoria Lee
Rebecca Morris
Joanne Protheroe
Gerry Richardson
Caroline Sanders
Angela Swallow
David Thompson
Anne Rogers
Salford National Institute for Health Research Gastrointestinal programme Grant Research Group

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of an intervention to enhance self management support for patients with chronic conditions in UK primary care.

designPragmatic, two arm, cluster randomised controlled trial.

settingGeneral practices, serving a population in northwest England with high levels of deprivation.

participants5599 patients with a diagnosis of diabetes (n=2546), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1634), and irritable bowel syndrome (n=1419) from 43 practices (19 intervention and 22 control practices).

interventionPractice level training in a whole systems approach to self management support. Practices were trained to use a range of resources: a tool to assess the support needs of patients, guidebooks on self management, and a web based directory of local self management resources. Training facilitators were employed by the health management organisation.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were shared decision making, self efficacy, and generic health related quality of life measured at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were general health, social or role limitations, energy and vitality, psychological wellbeing, self care activity, and enablement.

resultsWe randomised 44 practices and recruited 5599 patients, representing 43% of the eligible population on the practice lists. 4533 patients (81.0%) completed the six month follow-up and 4076 (72.8%) the 12 month follow-up. No statistically significant differences were found between patients attending trained practices and those attending control practices on any of the primary or secondary outcomes. All effect size estimates were well below the prespecified threshold of clinically important difference.

conclusionsAn intervention to enhance self management support in routine primary care did not add noticeable value to existing care for long term conditions. The active components required for effective self management support need to be better understood, both within primary care and in patients' everyday lives.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN90940049.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSelf EfficacyAgedChronic DiseaseDisease ManagementFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSelf CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23670660
PMCPMC3652644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.