Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2013
Community-partnered evaluation of depression services for clients of community-based agencies in under-resourced communities in Los Angeles.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01699789 (CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) Project of Community and Academic Partners Working Together to Learn the Best Way to Reduce Depression in Our Communities.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Multi-Sector Assessment and Client-Perception of Social Need at Long-Term Follow-Up of a Group-Randomized Trial of Community-Engaged Collaborative Care for Adults with Depression.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Engaging Community Networks to Improve Depression Services: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Community Engagement and Planning Intervention.Community mental health journal · 2021Trial
- Maintaining Internal Validity in Community Partnered Participatory Research: Experience from the Community Partners in Care Study.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- 12-Month Cost Outcomes of Community Engagement Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement: A Partnered, Cluster Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Coalitions Versus Technical Assistance for Depression Quality Improvement in Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- Community Partners in Care: 6- and 12-month Outcomes of Community Engagement versus Technical Assistance to Implement Depression Collaborative Care among Depressed Older Adults.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Trial
- A Community-Partnered, Participatory, Cluster-Randomized Study of Depression Care Quality Improvement: Three-Year Outcomes.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Trial
- The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in the Depression Care of African Americans and Hispanics in Los Angeles.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Trial
- Community Partners in Care: 6-Month Outcomes of Two Quality Improvement Depression Care Interventions in Male Participants.Ethnicity & disease · 2017Trial
- Community Engagement Compared With Technical Assistance to Disseminate Depression Care Among Low-Income, Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study.American journal of public health · 2016Trial
- Participation in Training for Depression Care Quality Improvement: A Randomized Trial of Community Engagement or Technical Support.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2015Trial
- 12-month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: a partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2014Trial
- The Impact of Community Engagement on Health, Social, and Utilization Outcomes in Depressed, Impoverished Populations: Secondary Findings from a Randomized Trial.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMTrial
- Article
- Study protocol for type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of strategies for depression care task-sharing in community health stations in Vietnam: DEP Project.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Depression at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, and Income.Journal of bisexuality · 2021Article
- Complexity in partnerships: A qualitative examination of collaborative depression care in primary care clinics and community-based organisations in California, United States.Health & social care in the community · 2020Article
- Engage for Equity: Development of Community-Based Participatory Research Tools.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs medical homes are developing under health reform, little is known regarding depression services need and use by diverse safety-net populations in under-resourced communities. For chronic conditions like depression, primary care services may face new opportunities to partner with diverse community service providers, such as those in social service and substance abuse centers, to support a collaborative care model of treating depression.
objectiveTo understand the distribution of need and current burden of services for depression in under-resourced, diverse communities in Los Angeles.
designBaseline phase of a participatory trial to improve depression services with data from client screening and follow-up surveys.
participantsOf 4,440 clients screened from 93 programs (primary care, mental health, substance abuse, homeless, social and other community services) in 50 agencies, 1,322 were depressed according to an eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) and gave contact information; 1,246 enrolled and 981 completed surveys. Ninety-three programs, including 17 primary care/public health, 18 mental health, 20 substance abuse, ten homeless services, and 28 social/other community services, participated. MAIN MEASURES: Comparisons by setting in 6-month retrospective recall of depression services use. KEY
resultsDepression prevalence ranged from 51.9 % in mental health to 17.2 % in social-community programs. Depressed clients used two settings on average to receive depression services; 82 % used any setting. More clients preferred counseling over medication for depression treatment.
conclusionsNeed for depression care was high, and a broad range of agencies provide depression care. Although most participants had contact with primary care, most depression services occurred outside of primary care settings, emphasizing the need to coordinate and support the quality of community-based services across diverse community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.