Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23670565›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2013

Patterns of bone mineral density testing in men receiving androgen deprivation for prostate cancer.

Vahakn B Shahinian, Yong-Fang Kuo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bone health assessment with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in men with high-risk prostate carcinoma commencing adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Bone health management in men undergoing ADT: examining enablers and barriers to care.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vahakn B ShahinianDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Room 3627, SPH I, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA, vahakn@umich.edu.
Yong-Fang Kuo
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Optimizing use of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancerR01CA140272 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHAHINIAN, VAHAKN B · 2009 to 2010
$483k
NCI NIH HHS CA140272NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractice guidelines recommend bone mineral density (BMD) monitoring for men on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer, but single center studies suggest this is underutilized.

objectiveWe examined determinants of BMD testing in men receiving ADT in a large population-based cohort of men with prostate cancer.

designRetrospective cohort study.

participantsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify 84,036 men with prostate cancer initiating ADT from 1996 through 2008. MAIN MEASURES: Rates of BMD testing within the period 12 months prior to 3 months after initiation of ADT were assessed and compared to matched controls without cancer and to men with prostate cancer not receiving ADT. A logistic regression model was performed predicting use of BMD testing, adjusted for patient demographics, indications for ADT use, year of diagnosis and specialty of the physician involved in the care of the patient. KEY

resultsRates of BMD testing increased steadily over time in men receiving ADT, diverging from the control groups such that by 2008, 11.5 % of men were receiving BMD testing versus 4.4 % in men with prostate cancer not on ADT and 3.8 % in the non-cancer controls. In the logistic regression model, year of diagnosis, race/ethnicity, indications for ADT use and geographic region were significant predictors of BMD testing. Patients with only a urologist involved in their care were significantly less likely to receive BMD testing as compared to those with both a urologist and a primary care physician (PCP) (odds ratio 0.71, 95 % confidence interval 0.64-0.80).

conclusionsThere has been a sharp increase in rates of BMD testing among men receiving ADT for prostate cancer over time, beyond rates noted in contemporaneous controls. Absolute rates of BMD testing remain low, however, but are higher in men who have a PCP involved in their care.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsCohort StudiesHumansMalePopulation SurveillanceProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramAndrogen Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID23670565
PMCPMC3797344
OpenAlexW2107449338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.