Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23670297›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2013

Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics receiving single-agent carfilzomib in the PX-171-003-A1 study.

A J Jakubowiak, D S Siegel, T Martin, M Wang, R Vij, S Lonial, S Trudel, V Kukreti, N Bahlis, M Alsina and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Double-Hit/Triple-Hit Multiple Myeloma Detected at Relapse.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Emerging agents and regimens for multiple myeloma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

A J JakubowiakSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
D S Siegel
T Martin
M Wang
R Vij
S Lonial
S Trudel
V Kukreti
N Bahlis
M Alsina
A Chanan-Khan
F Buadi
F J Reu
G Somlo
J Zonder
K Song
A K Stewart
E Stadtmauer
B L Harrison
A F Wong
R Z Orlowski
S Jagannath
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USEmory University · USHackensack University Medical Center · USJacksonville College · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USMultiple Myeloma Research Foundation · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
P4 -TARGETING MULTIPLE MYELOMA BY COMBINING CDK INHIBITORS AND BCL-2 ANTAGONISTSP50CA142509 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KWAK, LARRY W · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA142509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with poor outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM). We prospectively analyzed the impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes during the phase 2 PX-171-003-A1 study of single-agent carfilzomib for relapsed and refractory MM. In the response-evaluable population (257/266), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/conventional cytogenetic profiles were available for 229 patients; 62 (27.1%) had high-risk cytogenetics--del 17p13, t(4;14) or t(14;16) by interphase FISH or deletion 13 or hypodiploidy by metaphase cytogenetics--and 167 (72.9%) had standard-risk profiles. Generally, baseline characteristics were similar between the subgroups, but International Staging System stage III disease was more common in high- vs standard-risk patients (41.9% vs 27.5%) as was Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1/2 (85.5% vs 68.3%). Overall response was comparable between the subgroups (25.8% vs 24.6%, respectively; P=0.85), while time-to-event end points showed a trend of shorter duration in high-risk patients, including median duration of response (5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-7.8) vs 8.3 months (95% CI 5.6-12.3)) and overall survival (9.3 (95% CI 6.5-13.0) vs 19.0 months (95% CI 15.4-NE); P=0.0003). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that single-agent carfilzomib is efficacious and has the potential to at least partially overcome the impact of high-risk cytogenetics in heavily pre-treated patients with MM.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaOligopeptidesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentscarfilzomibOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID23670297
PMCPMC3865533
OpenAlexW2068045978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.