Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2014
Randomised trial comparing Lichtenstein vs Trabucco vs Valenti techniques in inguinal hernia repair.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- International guidelines for groin hernia management.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Guideline
- Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2017Pooled it
- Inguinal hernia repair with the trabucco technique: A multicenter analysis with 5-year follow-up.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Do we really need three-dimensional convex inguinal hernia meshes?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFollowing Lichtenstein's technique, over the last 15 years several variation have been proposed, such as Trabucco's sutureless technique and the use of two self-regulating prostheses, proposed by Valenti that have given excellent results. The aim of this prospective and randomised study was to determine whether there are differences in the results obtained with these three techniques.
methodsOf 812 patients submitted to inguinal hernia repair, we selected and randomised 162 patients into three groups of 54 patients each: Lichtenstein (Group L), Trabucco (Group T) and Valenti (Group V). Surgical procedures were performed in all cases by residents in surgery using local anaesthesia. Primary endpoint was intensity of postoperative pain. Median follow-up was 8 years.
resultsThe primary analysis of postoperative pain at 48 h did not report any significant difference between the three groups as for secondary analyses except that the Trabucco procedure took less operative time than the Lichtenstein, and the Valenti group was more painful than the Lichtenstein group at the third postoperative day. In our series median operation time was 60 min. Recurrence rate was 1.85%.
conclusionsSurgical repair of inguinal hernia according to the Lichtenstein, Trabucco and Valenti techniques is safe and easy to perform regardless of the surgical experience of the operator, with excellent results and no differences due to technique used as regards almost all of the parameters studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23670167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.