Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23670093›Full record

ReviewAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2013

Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials.

O E Rahma, A Duffy, D J Liewehr, S M Steinberg, T F Greten

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Modulating tumor mechanics and vascular barriers to enhance chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic tumors and melanoma.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O E RahmaGastrointestinal Malignancy Section, Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
A Duffy
D J Liewehr
S M Steinberg
T F Greten
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Office of Collaborative BiostatisticsZIDSC007202 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOO-WOSOBA, HYOYOUNG · 2009 to 2025
$14.5M
Clinical protocols for the treatment of GI cancerZIABC011343 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GRETEN, TIM · 2010 to 2025
$4.8M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is currently no standard of care for the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this analysis was to compare the different therapeutic approaches in this setting.

methodsWe carried out a systematic analysis of second-line studies in advanced pancreatic cancer that have progressed on or following gemcitabine and published or presented from 2000 to 2012.

resultsForty-four clinical trials (t) were identified; of which 34 met the inclusion criteria treating an aggregate total of 1503 patients (n). Patients who received treatments (t: 33; n: 1269) had a median overall survival (OS) of 6 months compared with 2.8 months for patients who received best supportive care only (t: 2; n: 234) (P = 0.013). The gemcitabine and platinum-based combination (t: 5; n: 154) provided a median progression-free survival and OS of 4 and 6 months compared with 1.6 and 5.3 for the rest of the regimens (t: 29; n: 1349) (P = 0.059 and 0.10, respectively) and 2.9 and 5.7 for the combination of 5-fluorouracil and platinum agents (t: 12; n: 450) (P = 0.60 and 0.22, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Although not conclusive, these data showed that the advantage of second-line chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is very limited and there is a need for more studies.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged-Ring CompoundsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalErlotinib HydrochlorideFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPlatinum CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesSurvivalTaxoidsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBridged-Ring CompoundsDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideFluorouracilGemcitabinePlatinum CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinestaxaneTaxoidsanalysiscancerpancreaticreviewsecond-linetreatment

Identifiers

PMID23670093
PMCPMC3718508
OpenAlexW2156714215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.