Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23669517›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2013

Prevalence of use of human milk in US advanced care neonatal units.

Cria G Perrine, Kelley S Scanlon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Developing a prioritized research agenda for necrotizing enterocolitis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Balancing access to donor human milk: Rationing vs expanding use.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Donor Human Milk Use in Advanced Neonatal Care Units - United States, 2020.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence and predictors of donor milk programs among U.S. advanced neonatal care facilities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  17. Policy statement of enteral nutrition for preterm and very low birthweight infants.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2020
    Article
  18. Disparities in Donor Human Milk Supplementation Among Well Newborns.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. NIH workshop on human milk composition: summary and visions.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cria G PerrineCenters forDisease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. cperrine@cdc.gov
Kelley S Scanlon

Funding

Nutrition Sciences and HealthT32DK007734 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RAMAKRISHNAN, USHA · 1997 to 2016
$2.5M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe American Academy of Pediatrics recommends all preterm infants receive human milk. The objective of this study was to describe the use of human milk in advanced care neonatal units of US maternity hospitals.

methodsWe used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's national Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care survey from 2007, 2009, and 2011 to analyze 2 questions to describe the prevalence of US advanced care (special/level 2 or intensive/level 3) neonatal units routinely providing human milk to infants, and the use of any donor milk in these units.

resultsIn 2011, 30.8% of maternity hospitals reported that most infants (≥90%) were routinely provided human milk in advanced care units, compared with 26.7% in 2009 and 21.2% in 2007 (trend P < .001). States in the Northwest and Northeast had a higher prevalence of hospitals routinely providing human milk to ≥90% of infants in advanced care units. In 2011, 22.0% of maternity hospitals providing advanced care used banked donor milk, compared with 14.4% in 2009 and 11.5% in 2007 (trend P < .001). Most of this increase occurred in intensive care units (25.1% 2007 vs 45.2% 2011; trend P < .001). There was substantial geographic variation in the prevalence of advanced care units using donor milk; generally the prevalence was higher in the West and in states with a milk bank in the state or a neighboring state.

conclusionsThe use of human milk in US advanced care neonatal units is increasing; however, only one-third of these units are routinely providing human milk to most infants.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMilk, HumanHospitals, MaternityHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMilk BanksPrevalenceUnited Statesdonor milkhospitalhuman milkintensive careNICUspecial care

Identifiers

PMID23669517
PMCPMC4535053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.