Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23669422›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

The imaging viewpoint: how imaging affects determination of progression-free survival.

Daniel Carl Sullivan, Lawrence H Schwartz, Binsheng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic significance of Standard Uptake Value (SUVAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Repeatability ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2016
    Article
  10. Overview: progression-free survival as an endpoint in clinical trials with solid tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Carl SullivanDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. daniel.sullivan@duke.edu
Lawrence H Schwartz
Binsheng Zhao

Funding

NIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268201000050C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor measurements on computed tomgoraphic or MRI scans and/or the appearance of new lesions on any of a variety of imaging studies including positron emission tomographic scans are key determinants for assessing progression-free survival as an endpoint in many clinical trials of therapies for solid tumors. Test-retest tumor measurement reproducibility may vary considerably across serial scans on the same patient unless rigorous attention is paid to standardization of image acquisition parameters and unless measurements are made by trained, experienced observers using validated objective methods. Target lesion selection also must be done with care to choose lesions that are or will be reproducibly measurable. Likewise, new lesions will be missed or misinterpreted on follow-up imaging studies unless those imaging studies are obtained using techniques suitable for detecting early, small lesions. Reader variability is clearly a major component of the problem. The increasing availability of semiautomatic image processing algorithms will help ameliorate that issue. In addition, an array of internationally accepted guidelines, standards, and accreditation programs now exist to help address these problems.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingDisease-Free SurvivalEndpoint DeterminationFollow-Up StudiesHumansNeoplasmsRadiographyRadionuclide ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23669422
PMCPMC3654392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.