Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23667718›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2013

Error Analysis and Propagation in Metabolomics Data Analysis.

Hunter N B Moseley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiplatform untargeted metabolomics.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hunter N B MoseleyDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Regulatory and Environmental Analytical Metabolomics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

ZEBRAFISH VISUAL FUNCTION RECOVERY FOLLOWING OPTIC NERVE DAMAGEP20RR016481 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BARTON, HAZEL A · 2001 to 2011
$34.8M
Integrated Chemoselective and Informatic Platform for Large-Scale MetabolomicsR01ES022191 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, HIGASHI, RICHARD M · 2012 to 2016
$3.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016481NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES022191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Error analysis plays a fundamental role in describing the uncertainty in experimental results. It has several fundamental uses in metabolomics including experimental design, quality control of experiments, the selection of appropriate statistical methods, and the determination of uncertainty in results. Furthermore, the importance of error analysis has grown with the increasing number, complexity, and heterogeneity of measurements characteristic of 'omics research. The increase in data complexity is particularly problematic for metabolomics, which has more heterogeneity than other omics technologies due to the much wider range of molecular entities detected and measured. This review introduces the fundamental concepts of error analysis as they apply to a wide range of metabolomics experimental designs and it discusses current methodologies for determining the propagation of uncertainty in appropriate metabolomics data analysis. These methodologies include analytical derivation and approximation techniques, Monte Carlo error analysis, and error analysis in metabolic inverse problems. Current limitations of each methodology with respect to metabolomics data analysis are also discussed.

Indexed as

error analysiserror propagationmass spectrometrymetabolomicsnuclear magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID23667718
PMCPMC3647477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.