Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23667487›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

The efficacy of lapatinib in metastatic breast cancer with HER2 non-amplified primary tumors and EGFR positive circulating tumor cells: a proof-of-concept study.

Justin Stebbing, Rachel Payne, Justine Reise, Adam E Frampton, Miranda Avery, Laura Woodley, Angelo Di Leo, Marta Pestrin, Jonathan Krell, R Charles Coombes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00820924 (A Phase II Open Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Dose of Lapatinib in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With HER-2 Non-amplified Primary Tumours and HER-2 Positive Circulating Tumour Cells or EGFR Positive Circulating Tumor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00820924 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase II Open Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Dose of Lapatinib in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With HER-2 Non-amplified Primary Tumours and HER-2 Positive Circulating Tumour Cells or EGFR Positive Circulating Tumor Cells

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2008 to 2011Enrolled23ConditionsNeoplasms, BreastArmsLAPATINIB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Circulating tumor cells: clinical validity and utility.International journal of clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The promise of liquid biopsy in cancer: a clinical perspective.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2015
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Justin StebbingDepartment of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom. j.stebbing@imperial.ac.uk
Rachel Payne
Justine Reise
Adam E Frampton
Miranda Avery
Laura Woodley
Angelo Di Leo
Marta Pestrin
Jonathan Krell
R Charles Coombes
National Health Service · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GBHospital of Prato · ITImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12011Cancer Research UK 14549Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) provides real-time measures of cancer sub-populations with potential for CTC-directed therapeutics. We examined whether lapatinib which binds both HER2 and EGFR could induce depletion of the EGFR-positive pool of CTCs, which may in turn lead to clinical benefits. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with metastatic breast cancer and HER2 non-amplified primary tumors with EGFR-positive CTCs were recruited and lapatinib 1500 mg daily was administered, in a standard two step phase 2 trial.

resultsThere were no responses leading to termination at the first analysis with 16 patients recruited out of 43 screened. In 6 out of 14 (43%) individuals eligible for the efficacy analysis, a decrease in CTCs was observed with most of these having a greater decrease in their EGFR-positive CTC pool.

conclusionsThis is one of the first studies of CTC-directed therapeutics and suggests that lapatinib monotherapy is not having any demonstrable clinical effects by reducing the EGFR-positive pool of CTCs in HER2 non-amplified primary tumors. Our attempt to expand the pool of patients eligible for a targeted therapy was unsuccessful; the role of clonal populations in cancer biology and therapeutic strategies to control them will require extensive evaluation in years to come.

trial registrationClinical trials.gov NCT00820924.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsHumansLapatinibMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingQuinazolinesEGFR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsLapatinibQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID23667487
PMCPMC3647066
OpenAlexW2059427500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.