ArticleInternational journal of mass spectrometry2012
The influence glutamic acid in protonated b
Article in International journal of mass spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Participation of C-H Protons in the Dissociation of a Proton Deficient Dipeptide.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Combinatorial Labeling Method for Improving Peptide Fragmentation in Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Spectroscopic identification of cyclic imide b2-ions from peptides containing Gln and Asn residues.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A direct pathway for the fragmentation of peptide b
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.