Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23667161›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2013

Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data.

Linda Vesel, Alexander Manu, Terhi J Lohela, Sabine Gabrysch, Eunice Okyere, Augustinus H A Ten Asbroek, Zelee Hill, Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Betty R Kirkwood

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00623337 (Cluster Randomised Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Routine Home Visits to Provide a Package of Essential Newborn Care Interventions in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy and the 1st Week of Life on Neonatal Mortality in Rural Ghana), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00623337 phase3completednot on this map

Cluster Randomised Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Routine Home Visits to Provide a Package of Essential Newborn Care Interventions in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy and the 1st Week of Life on Neonatal Mortality in Rural Ghana

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2009 to 2010Enrolled15,000ConditionsNeonatal MortalityArmsHome visits
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linda VeselDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health Intervention Research, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alexander Manu
Terhi J Lohela
Sabine Gabrysch
Eunice Okyere
Augustinus H A Ten Asbroek
Zelee Hill
Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang
Seth Owusu-Agyei
Betty R Kirkwood

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the structural capacity for, and quality of, immediate and essential newborn care (ENC) in health facilities in rural Ghana, and to link this with demand for facility deliveries and admissions.

designHealth facility assessment survey and population-based surveillance data.

settingSeven districts in Brong Ahafo Region, Ghana.

participantsHeads of maternal/neonatal wards in all 64 facilities performing deliveries.

main outcome measuresIndicators include: the availability of essential infrastructure, newborn equipment and drugs, and personnel; vignette scores and adequacy of reasons given for delayed discharge of newborn babies; and prevalence of key immediate ENC practices that facilities should promote. These are matched to the percentage of babies delivered in and admitted to each type of facility.

results70% of babies were delivered in health facilities; 56% of these and 87% of neonatal admissions were in four referral level hospitals. These had adequate infrastructure, but all lacked staff trained in ENC and some essential equipment (including incubators and bag and masks) and/or drugs. Vignette scores for care of very low-birth-weight babies were generally moderate-to-high, but only three hospitals achieved high overall scores for quality of ENC. We estimate that only 33% of babies were born in facilities capable of providing high quality, basic resuscitation as assessed by a vignette plus the presence of a bag and mask. Promotion of immediate ENC practices in facilities was also inadequate, with coverage of early initiation of breastfeeding and delayed bathing both below 50% for babies born in facilities; this represents a lost opportunity.

conclusionsUnless major gaps in ENC equipment, drugs, staff, practices and skills are addressed, strategies to increase facility utilisation will not achieve their potential to save newborn lives.

trial registrationhttp://clinicaltrials.gov NCT00623337.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyNeonatologyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID23667161
PMCPMC3651975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.