ArticleGenes & development2013
Molecular antagonism between X-chromosome and autosome signals determines nematode sex.
Article in Genes & development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel transcriptional regulation of embryonic sex determination and dosage compensation by the X-signal element sex-1.Genetics · 2026Article
- Aberrant X chromosome dosage compensation causes hybrid male inviability inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Multi-level transcriptional regulation of embryonic sex determination and dosage compensation by the X-signal elementbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- XOL-1 regulates developmental timing by modulating the H3K9 landscape in C. elegans early embryos.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Chromatin Organization duringDNA · 2024Article
- Sex matters in preclinical research.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- CUT homeobox genes: transcriptional regulation of neuronal specification and beyond.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Review
- The X chromosome in C. elegans sex determination and dosage compensation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
- Review
- Sex Determination in Nematode Germ Cells.Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation · 2022Review
- DMRT1 gene disruption alone induces incomplete gonad feminization in chicken.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021Article
- Identification and Functional Analysis of the Sex-DeterminerFrontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Dose-dependent action of the RNA binding protein FOX-1 to relay X-chromosome number and determineeLife · 2020Article
- Barbara J. Meyer: 2018 Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal.Genetics · 2019Article
- Sex and death: from cell fate specification to dynamic control of X-chromosome structure and gene expression.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018Article
- A Sex Chromosome piRNA Promotes Robust Dosage Compensation and Sex Determination in C. elegans.Developmental cell · 2018Article
- Sex-Specific Gene Expression and Life Span Regulation.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2017Review
- A gene-centered C. elegans protein-DNA interaction network provides a framework for functional predictions.Molecular systems biology · 2016Article
- Developmental Dynamics of X-Chromosome Dosage Compensation by the DCC and H4K20me1 in C. elegans.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Balancing up and downregulation of the C. elegans X chromosomes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex is determined in Caenorhabditis elegans by the ratio of X chromosomes to the sets of autosomes, the X:A signal. A set of genes called X signal elements (XSEs) communicates X-chromosome dose by repressing the masculinizing sex determination switch gene xol-1 (XO lethal) in a dose-dependent manner. xol-1 is active in 1X:2A embryos (males) but repressed in 2X:2A embryos (hermaphrodites). Here we showed that the autosome dose is communicated by a set of autosomal signal elements (ASEs) that act in a cumulative, dose-dependent manner to counter XSEs by stimulating xol-1 transcription. We identified new ASEs and explored the biochemical basis by which ASEs antagonize XSEs to determine sex. Multiple antagonistic molecular interactions carried out on a single promoter explain how different X:A values elicit different sexual fates. XSEs (nuclear receptors and homeodomain proteins) and ASEs (T-box and zinc finger proteins) bind directly to several sites on xol-1 to counteract each other's activities and thereby regulate xol-1 transcription. Disrupting ASE- and XSE-binding sites in vivo recapitulated the misregulation of xol-1 transcription caused by disrupting cognate signal element genes. XSE- and ASE-binding sites are distinct and nonoverlapping, suggesting that direct competition for xol-1 binding is not how XSEs counter ASEs. Instead, XSEs likely antagonize ASEs by recruiting cofactors with reciprocal activities that induce opposite transcriptional states. Most ASE- and XSE-binding sites overlap xol-1's -1 nucleosome, which carries activating chromatin marks only when xol-1 is turned on. Coactivators and corepressors tethered by proteins similar to ASEs and XSEs are known to deposit and remove such marks. The concept of a sex signal comprising competing XSEs and ASEs arose as a theory for fruit flies a century ago. Ironically, while the recent work of others showed that the fly sex signal does not fit this simple paradigm, our work shows that the worm signal does.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.