Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23666549›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2013

Biopsy-proven brain metastases from prostate cancer: a series of four cases with review of the literature.

C E Gzell, J G Kench, M R Stockler, G Hruby

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. What to Trust, PSA or [Research and reports in urology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C E GzellSydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. cgzell@gmail.com
J G Kench
M R Stockler
G Hruby

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsProstate cancer is very common and is the second most common cause of cancer death in males in Australia; however, brain metastases are exceedingly rare. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe review four cases of biopsy-proven brain metastases from prostate cancer and review the relevant literature.

resultsThree of four patients had acinar adenocarcinoma of prostate with one patient having ductal adenocarcinoma variant on histopathology. Three patients had the brain as the only site of metastatic disease. All patients underwent surgery, and three of four patients underwent adjuvant palliative radiotherapy to the brain.

conclusionBrain metastases from prostate cancer are rare, but brain metastases without other sites of metastatic disease are exceedingly rare and may be more common with ductal adenocarcinoma variant.

Indexed as

BiopsyAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm StagingProstatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.