ArticleHuman molecular genetics2013
In vitro-differentiated neural cell cultures progress towards donor-identical brain tissue.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- NOCICEPTRA2.0 - A comprehensive ncRNA atlas of human native and iPSC-derived sensory neurons.iScience · 2023Article
- Transcriptome Dynamics of Human Neuronal Differentiation From iPSC.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Transcriptional Profiling During Neural Conversion.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Epigenetic Analysis in Human Neurons: Considerations for Disease Modeling in PD.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Derivation of Leptomeninges Explant Cultures from Postmortem Human Brain Donors.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Hydrogel scaffolds promote neural gene expression and structural reorganization in human astrocyte cultures.PeerJ · 2017Article
- Searching for convergent pathways in autism spectrum disorders: insights from human brain transcriptome studies.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016Review
- Transcriptomics analysis of iPSC-derived neurons and modeling of neuropsychiatric disorders.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2016Review
- Modeling ALS with motor neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells.Nature neuroscience · 2016Review
- Assessing similarity to primary tissue and cortical layer identity in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical neurons through single-cell transcriptomics.Human molecular genetics · 2016Article
- Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders and Brain and Body Donation Program.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2015Article
- Comparison of REST cistromes across human cell types reveals common and context-specific functions.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Identification and function of long non-coding RNA.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple research groups have observed neuropathological phenotypes and molecular symptoms in vitro using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neural cell cultures (i.e. patient-specific neurons and glia). However, the global differences/similarities that may exist between in vitro neural cells and their tissue-derived counterparts remain largely unknown. In this study, we compared temporal series of iPSC-derived in vitro neural cell cultures to endogenous brain tissue from the same autopsy donor. Specifically, we utilized RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to evaluate the transcriptional progression of in vitro-differentiated neural cells (over a timecourse of 0, 35, 70, 105 and 140 days), and compared this with donor-identical temporal lobe tissue. We observed in vitro progression towards the reference brain tissue, and the following three results support this conclusion: (i) there was a significant increasing monotonic correlation between the days of our timecourse and the number of actively transcribed protein-coding genes and long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs) (P < 0.05), consistent with the transcriptional complexity of the brain; (ii) there was an increase in CpG methylation after neural differentiation that resembled the epigenomic signature of the endogenous tissue; and (iii) there was a significant decreasing monotonic correlation between the days of our timecourse and the percent of in vitro to brain-tissue differences (P < 0.05) for tissue-specific protein-coding genes and all putative lincRNAs. Taken together, these results are consistent with in vitro neural development and physiological progression occurring predominantly by transcriptional activation of downregulated genes rather than deactivation of upregulated genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.