ArticleMethods of information in medicine2013
Feasibility of feature-based indexing, clustering, and search of clinical trials. A case study of breast cancer trials from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Pooled it
- Medical concept normalization in clinical trials with drug and disease representation learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Automatic classification of registered clinical trials towards the Global Burden of Diseases taxonomy of diseases and injuries.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Valx: A System for Extracting and Structuring Numeric Lab Test Comparison Statements from Text.Methods of information in medicine · 2016Article
- Case-based reasoning using electronic health records efficiently identifies eligible patients for clinical trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Adaptive semantic tag mining from heterogeneous clinical research texts.Methods of information in medicine · 2015Article
- Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- ClinicalTrials.gov as a data source for semi-automated point-of-care trial eligibility screening.PloS one · 2014Article
- A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.Applied clinical informatics · 2014Article
- eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen standard therapies fail, clinical trials provide experimental treatment opportunities for patients with drug-resistant illnesses or terminal diseases. Clinical Trials can also provide free treatment and education for individuals who otherwise may not have access to such care. To find relevant clinical trials, patients often search online; however, they often encounter a significant barrier due to the large number of trials and in-effective indexing methods for reducing the trial search space.
objectivesThis study explores the feasibility of feature-based indexing, clustering, and search of clinical trials and informs designs to automate these processes.
methodsWe decomposed 80 randomly selected stage III breast cancer clinical trials into a vector of eligibility features, which were organized into a hierarchy. We clustered trials based on their eligibility feature similarities. In a simulated search process, manually selected features were used to generate specific eligibility questions to filter trials iteratively.
resultsWe extracted 1,437 distinct eligibility features and achieved an inter-rater agreement of 0.73 for feature extraction for 37 frequent features occurring in more than 20 trials. Using all the 1,437 features we stratified the 80 trials into six clusters containing trials recruiting similar patients by patient-characteristic features, five clusters by disease-characteristic features, and two clusters by mixed features. Most of the features were mapped to one or more Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts, demonstrating the utility of named entity recognition prior to mapping with the UMLS for automatic feature extraction.
conclusionsIt is feasible to develop feature-based indexing and clustering methods for clinical trials to identify trials with similar target populations and to improve trial search efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.