Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23666325›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2013

Arsenic bioremediation by biogenic iron oxides and sulfides.

Enoma O Omoregie, Raoul-Marie Couture, Philippe Van Cappellen, Claire L Corkhill, John M Charnock, David A Polya, David Vaughan, Karolien Vanbroekhoven, Jonathan R Lloyd

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial respiration - a biomineral perspective.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. In situ arsenic immobilisation for coastal aquifers using stimulated iron cycling: Lab-based viability assessment.Applied geochemistry : journal of the International Association of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Enoma O OmoregieWilliamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science and School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. omoregie@cab.inta-csic.es
Raoul-Marie Couture
Philippe Van Cappellen
Claire L Corkhill
John M Charnock
David A Polya
David Vaughan
Karolien Vanbroekhoven
Jonathan R Lloyd
University of Manchester · GBGeorgia Institute of Technology · USFlemish Institute for Technological Research · BEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcosms containing sediment from an aquifer in Cambodia with naturally elevated levels of arsenic in the associated groundwater were used to evaluate the effectiveness of microbially mediated production of iron minerals for in situ As remediation. The microcosms were first incubated without amendments for 28 days, and the release of As and other geogenic chemicals from the sediments into the aqueous phase was monitored. Nitrate or a mixture of sulfate and lactate was then added to stimulate biological Fe(II) oxidation or sulfate reduction, respectively. Without treatment, soluble As concentrations reached 3.9 ± 0.9 μM at the end of the 143-day experiment. However, in the nitrate- and sulfate-plus-lactate-amended microcosms, soluble As levels decreased to 0.01 and 0.41 ± 0.13 μM, respectively, by the end of the experiment. Analyses using a range of biogeochemical and mineralogical tools indicated that sorption onto freshly formed hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) and iron sulfide mineral phases are the likely mechanisms for As removal in the respective treatments. Incorporation of the experimental results into a one-dimensional transport-reaction model suggests that, under conditions representative of the Cambodian aquifer, the in situ precipitation of HFO would be effective in bringing groundwater into compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) provisional guideline value for As (10 ppb or 0.13 μM), although soluble Mn release accompanying microbial Fe(II) oxidation presents a potential health concern. In contrast, production of biogenic iron sulfide minerals would not remediate the groundwater As concentration below the recommended WHO limit.

Indexed as

ArsenicBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCambodiaFerric CompoundsGeologic SedimentsGroundwaterIron CompoundsModels, ChemicalMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicFerric Compoundsferric oxideIron CompoundsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID23666325
PMCPMC3697499
OpenAlexW2160914057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.