ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2013
Perceptions of family physician trainees and trainers regarding the usefulness of a virtual community of practice.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary Care Physicians' Interactions With a Novel Web-Based Active Learning Tool (The Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Qualitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Novel Web-Based Active Learning Tool for Primary Care Physicians' Continuing Professional Development (The Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Quantitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Drivers of engagement in virtual communities of practice: a qualitative study of Australian pharmacists' perceptions and experiences.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Leveraging home health aides to improve outcomes in heart failure: A pilot study protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2024Article
- Article
- Global community of practice: A means for capacity and community strengthening for health professionals in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- Using a Virtual Community of Practice to Support Stroke Best Practice Implementation: Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Interventions for managing professional isolation among health professionals in low resource environments: A scoping review.Health science reports · 2021Article
- Needs assessment for the creation of a community of practice in a community health navigator cohort.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of a virtual community of practice to primary care professionals regarding patient empowerment: a qualitative pilot study.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Health Care Professionals' Social Media Behavior and the Underlying Factors of Social Media Adoption and Use: Quantitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- Factors influencing the implementation, adoption, use, sustainability and scalability of eLearning for family medicine specialty training: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2016Article
- A Virtual Community of Practice for General Practice Training: A Preimplementation Survey.JMIR medical education · 2016Article
- Download Your Doctor: Implementation of a Digitally Mediated Personal Physician Presence to Enhance Patient Engagement With a Health-Promoting Internet Application.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- Online Versus Face-To-Face Training of Critical Time Intervention: A Matching Cluster Randomized Trial.The American journal of distance education · 2016Article
- How do general practice residents use social networking sites in asynchronous distance learning?BMC medical education · 2015Article
- Implementing a virtual community of practice for family physician training: a mixed-methods case study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining for Australian general practice, or family medicine, can be isolating, with registrars (residents or trainees) moving between rural and urban environments, and between hospital and community clinic posts. Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs), groups of people sharing knowledge about their domain of practice online and face-to-face, may have a role in overcoming the isolation associated with general practice training.
objectiveThis study explored whether Australian general practice registrars and their supervisors (trainers) would be able to use, and would be interested in using, a VCoP in the form of a private online network for work and training purposes. It also sought to understand the facilitators and barriers to intention to use such a community, and considers whether any of these factors may be modifiable.
methodsA survey was developed assessing computer, Internet, and social media access and usage, confidence, perceived usefulness, and barriers, facilitators, and intentions to use a private online network for training purposes. The survey was sent by email link to all 139 registrars and 224 supervisors in one of Australia's 17 general practice training regions. Complete and usable responses were received from 131 participants (response rate=0.4).
resultsMost respondents had access to broadband at home (125/131, 95.4%) and at work (130/131, 99.2%). Registrars were more likely to spend more than 2 hours on the Internet (P=.03), and to use social media sites for nonwork purposes (P=.01). On a 5-point Likert scale, confidence was high (mean 3.93, SD 0.63) and was negatively associated with higher age (P=.04), but not associated with training stage. Social media confidence was lower, with registrars more confident than supervisors for almost all social media activities. On a 5-point Likert scale, overall usefulness was scored positively (n=123, mean 3.63, SD 0.74), and was not significantly associated with age or training level. The main concerns of respondents were worries about privacy (registrar: 61/81, 75.3%; supervisor: 30/50, 60.0%) and insufficient time (registrar: 41/81, 50.6%; supervisor: 36/50, 72.0%). Using a multivariate generalized linear regression model, training stage and perceived usefulness were positively predictive, and concerns about privacy and time were negatively predictive of intention to use a private online network.
conclusionsGeneral practice registrars and supervisors are interested in using a private online network, or VCoP, for work and training purposes. Important considerations are the extent to which concerns such as privacy and usefulness may be overcome by training and support to offset some other concerns, such as time barriers. Participants at an early stage in their training are more receptive to using an online network. More senior registrars and supervisors may benefit from more training and promotion of the online network to improve their receptiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.