Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23666034›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2013

NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of PETbox4, a high sensitivity dedicated PET preclinical tomograph.

Z Gu, R Taschereau, N T Vu, H Wang, D L Prout, R W Silverman, B Bai, D B Stout, M E Phelps, A F Chatziioannou

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. HPhysics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  10. PET performance evaluation of the small-animal Hyperion IIBiomedical physics & engineering express · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A deformable atlas of the laboratory mouse.Molecular imaging and biology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Z GuCrump Institute for Molecular Imaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. zhgu@mednet.ucla.edu
R Taschereau
N T Vu
H Wang
D L Prout
R W Silverman
B Bai
D B Stout
M E Phelps
A F Chatziioannou
University of California, Los Angeles · USSofie Biosciences (United States) · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

UCLA Imaging Resource for Mouse Cancer ModelsR24CA092865 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PHELPS, MICHAEL E · 2001 to 2006
$4.3M
The UCLA Imaging Resource for Mouse Cancer ModelsU24CA092865 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHATZIIOANNOU, ARION XENOFON, PHELPS, MICHAEL E · 2007 to 2011
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R24 CA092865NCI NIH HHS R24 CA92865NCI NIH HHS U24 CA092865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PETbox4 is a new, fully tomographic bench top PET scanner dedicated to high sensitivity and high resolution imaging of mice. This manuscript characterizes the performance of the prototype system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 4-2008 standards, including studies of sensitivity, spatial resolution, energy resolution, scatter fraction, count-rate performance and image quality. The PETbox4 performance is also compared with the performance of PETbox, a previous generation limited angle tomography system. PETbox4 consists of four opposing flat-panel type detectors arranged in a box-like geometry. Each panel is made by a 24 × 50 pixelated array of 1.82 × 1.82 × 7 mm bismuth germanate scintillation crystals with a crystal pitch of 1.90 mm. Each of these scintillation arrays is coupled to two Hamamatsu H8500 photomultiplier tubes via a glass light guide. Volumetric images for a 45 × 45 × 95 mm field of view (FOV) are reconstructed with a maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm incorporating a system model based on a parameterized detector response. With an energy window of 150-650 keV, the peak absolute sensitivity is approximately 18% at the center of FOV. The measured crystal energy resolution ranges from 13.5% to 48.3% full width at half maximum (FWHM), with a mean of 18.0%. The intrinsic detector spatial resolution is 1.5 mm FWHM in both transverse and axial directions. The reconstructed image spatial resolution for different locations in the FOV ranges from 1.32 to 1.93 mm, with an average of 1.46 mm. The peak noise equivalent count rate for the mouse-sized phantom is 35 kcps for a total activity of 1.5 MBq (40 µCi) and the scatter fraction is 28%. The standard deviation in the uniform region of the image quality phantom is 5.7%. The recovery coefficients range from 0.10 to 0.93. In comparison to the first generation two panel PETbox system, PETbox4 achieves substantial improvements on sensitivity and spatial resolution. The overall performance demonstrates that the PETbox4 scanner is suitable for producing high quality images for molecular imaging based biomedical research.

Indexed as

AnimalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicePositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID23666034
PMCPMC4009355
OpenAlexW2037151014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.