ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2013
NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of PETbox4, a high sensitivity dedicated PET preclinical tomograph.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance evaluation of the ACTIVE 7 MAX benchtop preclinical PET scanner in accordance with the NEMA NU 4-2008 standard.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- First performance evaluation of easyPET.3D, a high-resolution and cost-effective benchtop preclinical PET scanner.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- A guideline proposal for mice preparation and care inEJNMMI research · 2022Review
- Performance evaluation of dual-ended readout PET detectors based on BGO arrays with different reflector arrangements.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- HPhysics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- A digital phoswich detector using time-over-threshold for depth of interaction in PET.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Small animal PET: a review of what we have done and where we are going.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Comments on the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standard on Performance Measurement of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs.EJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019Article
- PET performance evaluation of the small-animal Hyperion IIBiomedical physics & engineering express · 2018Article
- Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2017Article
- A New Pulse Pileup Rejection Method Based on Position Shift Identification.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2016Article
- TandemPET- A High Resolution, Small Animal, Virtual Pinhole-Based PET Scanner: Initial Design Study.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2016Article
- Evaluation of a BGO-Based PET System for Single-Cell Tracking Performance by Simulation and Phantom Studies.Molecular imaging · 2016Article
- Ultrasound-aided Multi-parametric Photoacoustic Microscopy of the Mouse Brain.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- A DOI Detector With Crystal Scatter Identification Capability for High Sensitivity and High Spatial Resolution PET Imaging.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2015Article
- A deformable atlas of the laboratory mouse.Molecular imaging and biology · 2015Article
- Evaluation of Matrix9 silicon photomultiplier array for small-animal PET.Medical physics · 2015Article
- Optimization of the Energy Window for PETbox4, a Preclinical PET Tomograph With a Small Inner Diameter.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PETbox4 is a new, fully tomographic bench top PET scanner dedicated to high sensitivity and high resolution imaging of mice. This manuscript characterizes the performance of the prototype system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 4-2008 standards, including studies of sensitivity, spatial resolution, energy resolution, scatter fraction, count-rate performance and image quality. The PETbox4 performance is also compared with the performance of PETbox, a previous generation limited angle tomography system. PETbox4 consists of four opposing flat-panel type detectors arranged in a box-like geometry. Each panel is made by a 24 × 50 pixelated array of 1.82 × 1.82 × 7 mm bismuth germanate scintillation crystals with a crystal pitch of 1.90 mm. Each of these scintillation arrays is coupled to two Hamamatsu H8500 photomultiplier tubes via a glass light guide. Volumetric images for a 45 × 45 × 95 mm field of view (FOV) are reconstructed with a maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm incorporating a system model based on a parameterized detector response. With an energy window of 150-650 keV, the peak absolute sensitivity is approximately 18% at the center of FOV. The measured crystal energy resolution ranges from 13.5% to 48.3% full width at half maximum (FWHM), with a mean of 18.0%. The intrinsic detector spatial resolution is 1.5 mm FWHM in both transverse and axial directions. The reconstructed image spatial resolution for different locations in the FOV ranges from 1.32 to 1.93 mm, with an average of 1.46 mm. The peak noise equivalent count rate for the mouse-sized phantom is 35 kcps for a total activity of 1.5 MBq (40 µCi) and the scatter fraction is 28%. The standard deviation in the uniform region of the image quality phantom is 5.7%. The recovery coefficients range from 0.10 to 0.93. In comparison to the first generation two panel PETbox system, PETbox4 achieves substantial improvements on sensitivity and spatial resolution. The overall performance demonstrates that the PETbox4 scanner is suitable for producing high quality images for molecular imaging based biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.