Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23665343›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2013

Investigations into the involvement of NMDA mechanisms in recognition memory.

E Clea Warburton, Gareth R I Barker, Malcom W Brown

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. NMDA Receptor Activation-Dependent Antidepressant-Relevant Behavioral and Synaptic Actions of Ketamine.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dopaminergic neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex activity requires the NMDA receptor coagonist d-serine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Clea WarburtonSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Synapric Plasticity, University of Bristol, Bristol BS1 3NY, United Kingdom. e.c.warburton@bristol.ac.uk
Gareth R I Barker
Malcom W Brown
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010407/1Medical Research Council G0401403Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review will focus on evidence showing that NMDA receptor neurotransmission is critical for synaptic plasticity processes within brain regions known to be necessary for the formation of object recognition memories. The aim will be to provide evidence concerning NMDA mechanisms related to recognition memory processes and show that recognition memory for objects, places or associations between objects and places depends on NMDA neurotransmission within the perirhinal cortex, temporal association cortex medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Administration of the NMDA antagonist AP5, selectively into each of these brain regions has revealed that the extent of the involvement NMDA receptors appears dependent on the type of information required to solve the recognition memory task; thus NMDA receptors in the perirhinal cortex are crucial for the encoding of long-term recognition memory for objects, and object-in-place associations, but not for short-term recognition memory or for retrieval. In contrast the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex are required for both long-term and short-term recognition memory for places or associations between objects and places, or for recognition memory tasks that have a temporal component. Such studies have therefore confirmed that the multiple brain regions make distinct contributions to recognition memory but in addition that more than one synaptic plasticity process must be involved. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity'.

Indexed as

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerateAnimalsHippocampusMemoryMicroinjectionsNeuronal PlasticityPrefrontal CortexReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRecognition, PsychologySynaptic TransmissionTemporal Lobe2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateHippocampus NMDAPerirhinal cortexPlasticityPrefrontal cortexRecognition memory

Identifiers

PMID23665343
PMCPMC3895175
OpenAlexW1983971996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.