ArticleTrends in biotechnology2013
Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing.
Article in Trends in biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unsolved challenges of clinical whole-exome sequencing: a systematic literature review of end-users' views.BMC medical genomics · 2016Pooled it
- Certain vs. uncertain actionable secondary findings in a cohort of 500 Lebanese participants: What to report to the patient?PloS one · 2025Article
- Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary genetic findings about themselves.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Evaluating the resource implications of different service delivery models for offering additional genomic findings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Article
- The transformation of medical genetics by clinical genomics: hubris meets humility.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Review
- Secondary actionable findings identified by exome sequencing: expected impact on the organisation of care from the study of 700 consecutive tests.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Article
- Translating genomics to the clinical diagnosis of disorders/differences of sex development.Current topics in developmental biology · 2019Review
- Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- Next-generation sequencing approach for the diagnosis of human diseases: open challenges and new opportunities.EJIFCC · 2018Article
- The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings.The Hastings Center report · 2018Article
- Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research.Molecular psychiatry · 2018Article
- The Continuing Evolution of Ethical Standards for Genomic Sequencing in Clinical Care: Restoring Patient Choice.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2017Article
- Pediatric Whole Exome Sequencing: an Assessment of Parents' Perceived and Actual Understanding.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Informed consent for next-generation nucleotide sequencing studies: Aiding communication between participants and investigators.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- Inherited platelet disorders: Insight from platelet genomics using next-generation sequencing.Platelets · 2017Review
- Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Consent to epistemic interventions: a contribution to the debate on the right (not) to know.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2016Article
- Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.